In 2013, Gaurav Mehta sold his BMW and pooled ₹30 lakh to start a luxury watch brand in a country that makes almost no luxury watches of its own. Twelve years on, that gamble reported ₹25 crore ($2.6 million) in revenue for FY25, a wristwatch he built sits on the wrist of the Prime Minister, and yet when he walked into Shark Tank India Season 2 asking ₹50 lakh for 2% equity, all five sharks passed.
Jaipur Watch Company is not a story about a big raise or a fast exit. It is the slower, stranger story of a bootstrapped micro-brand that took eleven years to reach break-even scale, sells watches with 200-year-old coins for dials, and grew revenue more than twenty-fold between FY22 and FY25 without ever giving away equity. This deep dive works through what is verifiable, what the company claims, and where the public record simply runs out.
Quick facts
| Company | Jaipur Watch Company Private Limited (CIN U33309RJ2013PTC044067) |
| Founded | Incorporated 15 October 2013, Jaipur, Rajasthan (MCA/Tofler) |
| Founder(s) | Gaurav Mehta; co-director Pratibha Mehta |
| Businesses | Micro-luxury handcrafted wristwatches; two lines, Pret (ready-to-wear) and Bespoke (made-to-order), many with antique coins, stamps and heritage motifs as dials |
| Latest FY revenue | ₹25 crore, FY25 (reported/company-stated), up more than 150% over FY24 |
| Latest FY profit | Net profit reported up 1.7% YoY for the year ending March 2025; company states a 25% net margin (Tofler; Shark Tank pitch) |
| Listed | Private (unlisted) |
| Last valuation | ₹25 crore implied by the Shark Tank India ask (₹50 lakh for 2%), 2023 — no deal closed |
| Key shareholders | Gaurav Mehta (DIN 01887172) and Pratibha Mehta (DIN 06712549); no institutional equity investor on record |
What they do
Jaipur Watch Company designs and assembles limited-edition and bespoke wristwatches for a mostly affluent, mostly Indian buyer, sold direct-to-consumer online, through owned stores and through shop-in-shop counters. Its signature is Indian heritage rendered as a watch dial: pre-independence and British-India-era coins, postage stamps, Pichhwai paintings, feathers and precious stones set into the face of a mechanical or quartz watch. It positions itself as India’s first micro-luxury, bespoke watch brand, a claim that reflects its category rather than an audited market ranking.
The origin
The founding insight was an accident. In 2012, while dismantling a quartz watch, Gaurav Mehta found a hidden British-India-era coin inside, was taken with its historical charm, and replaced the dial with the coin. He wore it himself, friends and family started asking to buy one, and a hobby became a product idea. Mehta was a coin collector before he was a watchmaker, and the whole brand grew out of that overlap between horology and numismatics.
In 2013 he committed properly, selling his BMW and pooling ₹30 lakh to launch the company. The first range, the Imperial Collection, turned pre-independence coins into dials, and the pitch was deliberately national: a homegrown luxury object at a time when “Indian” and “luxury watch” were rarely said in the same sentence. Mehta has a background outside watchmaking, including an MA in Risk Management from Nottingham University Business School (2005), which mattered less than his willingness to fund the idea from his own pocket.
The struggle years
The early years were slow and unglamorous, and the company is candid about it. Two hard constraints defined the first phase:
- Retailers were sceptical of a luxury Indian watch brand, and buyers were hesitant to pay a premium for a homegrown product over an established Swiss name.
- There was no capital cushion. The business ran on Mehta’s own money, Facebook marketing and word-of-mouth, with shop-in-shop counters placed inside hotels such as the Taj and Oberoi to reach the right buyer where they already were.
Getting to any kind of scale took years, not quarters. The company reached break-even only in 2017, after investing in a manufacturing unit in Bengaluru, at which point it was producing around 2,000 watches a year. That is a four-year gap between founding and break-even, and the volumes were tiny by any mainstream watch standard. As late as FY22 (2021-22), annual sales were still only ₹1.07 crore, evidence that heritage-led, handcrafted watches are a patient business, not a scalable-overnight one.
The turning point
The turning point was a rejection. Jaipur Watch Company pitched on Shark Tank India Season 2 (aired 2023), asking ₹50 lakh for 2% equity, a ₹25 crore valuation. No shark invested. On the numbers that looked like a failure; on distribution it did the opposite. The televised exposure drove:
- More than 50,000 website visitors overnight after the episode aired.
- More than 1,000 new Instagram followers in the same window.
- Two new physical stores opened post-show, in Delhi and Jaipur.
The show also seeded high-visibility word-of-mouth. Angel investor Anupam Mittal became a customer and reportedly gifted a Jaipur Watch Company piece to Amitabh Bachchan on the sets of Kaun Banega Crorepati. The through-line is that a company can lose the deal and still win the pitch: the marketing value of national television outran the ₹50 lakh it did not raise, and revenue climbed steeply in the years that followed.
The money behind it
Jaipur Watch Company is, by the standards of the Indian startup scene, almost un-funded. It has taken no priced equity round on record and remains controlled by the founding family. The one disclosed external financing is debt-like, not dilutive:
- Founder capital, 2013: ₹30 lakh from Mehta selling his BMW; the business was bootstrapped from there.
- Klub, revenue-based financing, 2024: ₹1.6 crore raised in early May 2024 (round dated 30 April 2024 on Crunchbase). One outlet reported the figure as ₹1.35 crore; most reported ₹1.6 crore. The capital was earmarked for marketing and inventory, deliberately taken as revenue-based financing to avoid equity dilution.
On the corporate filing, authorised capital is ₹15 lakh and paid-up capital is just ₹1.22 lakh (Tofler), consistent with a company that has funded growth from cash flow rather than share sales. Klub, the financier, is a revenue-based-financing firm founded in 2019 that says it has backed more than 650 brands across India and the UAE. The absence of a big equity raise is the story here: this is a profitable-margin niche brand that chose control over capital.
How it makes money
The model is straightforward premium retail, with margins that come from craft and brand rather than volume:
- Two product tiers. Pret (ready-to-wear, limited editions) is priced roughly ₹20,000-50,000. Bespoke (made-to-order) runs far higher, roughly ₹1.5 lakh to ₹24 lakh per piece.
- Margin structure (company-stated on Shark Tank): gross margin around 75% and net margin around 25%. High gross margins are plausible for handcrafted luxury where the coin/heritage element and brand carry the price, not the movement cost.
- Channels: direct-to-consumer online, owned retail stores, and shop-in-shop counters; the store count reached 13 across India by the FY25 period.
- Cost base: assembly and a manufacturing unit in Bengaluru (from 2017), inventory of movements/cases/coins, marketing, and retail. The Klub money went specifically into marketing and inventory, the two levers a premium D2C brand pulls to grow.
The part people get wrong: this is not a technology or scale play. Volumes are small (about 2,000 watches a year at 2017 break-even), and the economics rest on selling a limited number of high-margin objects to buyers who value the story, not on moving units cheaply.
The numbers
Public financials are partial. FY22 is on the filing record; FY23 and FY25 are reported as growth rates and a revenue headline; exact FY24 revenue has not been disclosed publicly. All figures below are labelled with what is verifiable and what is reported.
| Period | Revenue (₹ crore) | Profitability signal |
| FY22 (2021-22) | 1.07 (filing/company-stated) | Pret 80% / Bespoke 20% of sales |
| FY23 | Revenue up 154.2% YoY (reported) | EBITDA up 74.6% YoY (reported) |
| FY24 | Not publicly disclosed | — |
| FY25 (to Mar 2025) | 25 (reported), up >150% over FY24 | EBITDA +21.3%, net profit +1.7%, net worth +65.6% YoY (Tofler) |
Read carefully, the arc is: a sub-₹1 crore business around FY20, ₹1.07 crore in FY22, a 154.2% jump in FY23, and a reported ₹25 crore by FY25. The company also cites a 25% net margin and a compound growth rate of about 77% over the trailing year. These are company-stated or reported figures rather than audited numbers pulled from filings, and the FY25 revenue headline in particular comes from press coverage, so it should be read as reported, not audited.
Where the money comes from
The revenue mix and the customer base are the interesting part:
- By product (FY22 split): Pret drove about 80% of sales and Bespoke about 20%. The volume sits in the ₹20,000-50,000 band, while the very high-ticket bespoke pieces are a smaller share of revenue despite their price.
- By geography: primarily India, sold online and through 13 owned stores, with a global customer base served on top of the domestic core.
- The surprise, the customer list: the brand’s marketing rests on who wears it. Reported wearers include Prime Minister Narendra Modi, plus public figures such as Ed Sheeran, R. Madhavan, Sidharth Malhotra, Yuzvendra Chahal and Raveena Tandon. For a company this size, that roster is the real distribution asset, more than any single sales channel.
The counter-intuitive point: the cheaper Pret line, not the headline-grabbing ₹24 lakh bespoke commissions, is what actually pays the bills.
The risks
- Tiny scale, concentrated on one person. The business is closely held by the founding family with paid-up capital of ₹1.22 lakh and no institutional board. Brand, design direction and celebrity relationships all run through Gaurav Mehta, which is a single point of failure if he steps back.
- Thin, opaque financials. Much of what is public is growth percentages and a reported ₹25 crore revenue figure rather than audited, line-by-line filings. FY24 revenue is not disclosed. That makes the growth story hard to independently verify and leaves outside observers dependent on company-stated numbers.
- Demand and input dependence. The model relies on a steady supply of antique coins, stamps and heritage materials and on affluent buyers who want a homegrown luxury story. Both are narrow: the supply of genuine pre-independence coins is finite, and premium discretionary demand is cyclical and exposed to competition from established Swiss and Japanese brands with far deeper pockets.
The takeaway
The transferable lesson is that distribution can be worth more than the cheque. Jaipur Watch Company walked off Shark Tank India with no deal and, on paper, nothing to show for the pitch. What it actually got, 50,000 visitors overnight, a store expansion and a customer roster that now includes the Prime Minister, compounded into a reported twenty-fold revenue climb without surrendering a single share. For founders of small, high-margin, story-led brands, the model is instructive: protect the equity, use owned and earned media as the growth engine, and treat every rejection that comes with an audience as a marketing budget you did not have to pay for.
Frequently asked questions
Who founded Jaipur Watch Company and when?
Gaurav Mehta founded it, incorporating Jaipur Watch Company Private Limited on 15 October 2013 in Jaipur, Rajasthan. He funded the launch by selling his BMW and pooling about ₹30 lakh. Pratibha Mehta is the co-director.
What makes its watches distinctive?
The brand sets Indian heritage elements into the dial, most famously pre-independence and British-India-era coins, along with postage stamps, Pichhwai paintings, feathers and precious stones. It sells a ready-to-wear Pret line (about ₹20,000-50,000) and a made-to-order Bespoke line (about ₹1.5-24 lakh).
Did Jaipur Watch Company get a deal on Shark Tank India?
No. On Shark Tank India Season 2 (2023) Gaurav Mehta asked for ₹50 lakh for 2% equity, a ₹25 crore valuation, and no shark invested. The exposure still drove more than 50,000 website visits overnight and helped the company open new stores.
How much revenue does Jaipur Watch Company make?
Revenue was reported at ₹25 crore for FY25 (year to March 2025), up more than 150% over FY24. For context, FY22 sales were ₹1.07 crore and FY23 revenue reportedly rose 154.2% year on year. The ₹25 crore figure is company-stated/reported rather than audited.
Has the company raised outside funding?
It is largely bootstrapped. The one disclosed external financing is about ₹1.6 crore of revenue-based financing from Klub in 2024 (one source reported ₹1.35 crore), taken specifically to avoid diluting equity. There is no priced equity round on record.
Sources
Figures are as of September 2026. Currency converted at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026 (Trading Economics).
- Tofler, Jaipur Watch Company Private Limited company profile and FY-ending-March-2025 financial signals (accessed September 2026)
- The Company Check, Jaipur Watch Company Private Limited FY 2026 profile (accessed September 2026)
- StartupTalky, “Jaipur Watch Company Records ₹25 Cr Revenue; Worn by PM Modi” (2025)
- Inshorts, “Jaipur Watch Company records ₹25 cr revenue; PM Modi among wearers” (2025)
- Indian Retailer, “Why Jaipur Watch Company is on a Success Path Even After Not Securing a Deal on Shark Tank India” (2023)
- Shark Tank Audits, “Jaipur Watch Company Shark Tank India Review” (2023)
- SharkTankSeason, Shark Tank India Season 2, Jaipur Watch Company pitch details (2023)
- Business Remedies, “The Journey of Jaipur Watch Company’s Founder, Gaurav Mehta” (2024)
- FashionNetwork India, “Jaipur Watch Company raises Rs 1.6 crore funding from Klub” (May 2024)
- The Hour Markers, “Jaipur Watch Company Secures Rs 1.6 Crore From Klub” (May 2024)
- Klubworks, “Why did Jaipur Watch Company choose funding without equity dilution?” (2024)
- Crunchbase, Jaipur Watch Company debt-financing round (30 April 2024)
Found an error? Write to us and we’ll correct it in the open, dated, on the piece.