In November 2025, Flutter Entertainment — the world’s largest online betting and gaming group — booked a $556 million (about ₹5,338 crore) non-cash write-off on a single Indian business it had bought only four years earlier. The business was not a failing experiment: Junglee Games was a profitable, largely bootstrapped rummy operator with close to 75 million registered users that a single new law switched off almost overnight.
Junglee’s story is the sharpest case study yet of a peculiarly Indian risk — a company can do everything right, get bought by a $30 billion global operator at a premium, keep posting profits, and still lose its entire core market to one Act of Parliament. This deep dive traces how a computer-science graduate’s bootstrapped rummy app became Flutter’s India bet, how it made money, and why The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 turned a $440 million-plus asset into a free-to-play shell.
Quick facts
| Company | Junglee Games, Inc. (parent); Junglee Games India Private Limited (India operating entity, CIN U72200HR2011PTC114723) |
| Founded | 2012 (Junglee Games, San Francisco); Indian entity incorporated 19 May 2011 |
| Founder / CEO | Ankush Gera (founder-CEO), with an early founding team; Gera previously founded Monsoon, later acquired by Capital One |
| Businesses | Junglee Rummy, Howzat (fantasy sports), Junglee Teen Patti, Junglee Poker, Eatme.io |
| Revenue (FY23) | ₹930 crore+ group revenue (Inc42); India entity “over ₹500 crore” for the year to 31 December 2023 (Tofler) |
| Profit (India entity) | Net profit ₹71.3 crore (FY23) declining to ₹28.9 crore (FY25), per Tracxn |
| Ownership | Private; controlled by Flutter Entertainment plc (majority from January 2021, later raised to ~95%+) |
| Last valuation | More than $440 million implied by Flutter’s buy-out; Flutter has spent over $200 million in total (company/press reports) |
What Junglee Games does
Junglee Games builds and operates online skill-gaming platforms for Indian players, most of them played for real money. The flagship is Junglee Rummy, a 13-card online rummy service; alongside it sit Howzat, a fantasy-sports app; Junglee Teen Patti and Junglee Poker; and the casual title Eatme.io. The company reported close to 75 million registered users across these products. Until August 2025 the money came from players staking cash on games the company argued were games of skill — a legal distinction, discussed below, that the 2025 law erased.
The origin
Junglee Games was founded in 2012 by Ankush Gera, a computer-science and bioinformatics graduate of San Jose State University who had spent the 2000s in the San Francisco Bay Area. Gera was not a first-time founder. He had earlier built Monsoon, a boutique software company that was acquired by Capital One — an exit that gave him the capital and the conviction to start again.
The founding insight was specific to India: rummy is a game Indians already knew and played socially, and Indian courts had long treated it as a game of skill rather than gambling. That legal footing, Gera bet, made online real-money rummy a business you could build in the open, unlike casino-style chance games. He set up in San Francisco but pointed the product squarely at Indian players, with operations that grew out of Gurugram. The early team included co-founders and operators who built the rummy engine and the payments and anti-fraud plumbing that a real-money platform lives or dies on.
The struggle years
Junglee’s difficulty was never a single near-death event; it was a decade of building a real-money business on ground that kept shifting under it. Three strands ran through the struggle years:
- Thin early capital. Junglee raised only about $3.5 million in 2013, from backers including 500 Startups and Velo Partners, and then largely stopped raising. It grew as a bootstrapped company — unusual for Indian consumer internet, where rivals burned venture money on marketing. That meant every rupee of user-acquisition spend had to be earned, not funded.
- A permanent legal question mark. The whole model rested on the “game of skill” defence. Individual Indian states periodically moved to ban or restrict online real-money games — Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and others passed or attempted bans through the early 2020s — forcing operators like Junglee into repeated court fights and state-by-state withdrawals.
- Tax and trust pressure. The sector fought a running battle over taxation and public perception of “gaming for money,” culminating in a 28% GST on the full face value of bets from October 2023 that squeezed unit economics across the whole real-money industry.
Junglee survived all of this by staying profitable and disciplined where flashier rivals leaned on funding. That same discipline is what made it an attractive acquisition target rather than an acquirer.
The turning point
The defining event came in two acts, four years apart, and they point in opposite directions.
The first was the Flutter deal. On the completion date reported as early 2021, Flutter Entertainment — owner of PokerStars, Betfair, Paddy Power and, later, FanDuel — acquired an initial 50.1% stake in Junglee Games for $67.3 million. That put a global betting major behind an Indian rummy app for the first time, and validated a bootstrapped company at a valuation reported at more than $440 million. Flutter then kept buying: a further 7.2% for $8 million in mid-2021, and additional steps that took its ownership toward 95%-plus, with total outlay reported at over $200 million.
The second act was the reversal. On 22 August 2025 The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 received presidential assent. It banned offering online “real money games” outright and — critically — folded skill-based and chance-based games into one prohibited category, collapsing the skill defence Junglee had been built on. Flutter’s response was immediate: Junglee ceased all paid operations in India and moved to free-to-play content only. The numbers on either side of that single law tell the whole story — a business valued above $440 million in 2021, written down by $556 million in 2025.
The money behind it
Junglee’s cap table is unusual because it stayed lean before being bought outright. The shape:
- Seed capital (2013): about $3.5 million raised, with 500 Startups and Velo Partners among the named early backers. Junglee then operated largely bootstrapped for years.
- Flutter, initial control (reported early 2021): 50.1% acquired for $67.3 million, with an option over the rest.
- Flutter, step-up (June 2021): an additional 7.2% for $8 million.
- Bolt-on (FY2022): Junglee absorbed Sachiko Gaming Private Limited, an India-based online poker developer, in exchange for a 5.0% equity stake in a Junglee subsidiary.
- Full buy-out: Flutter later wrote a further cheque reported at around $67 million to complete the acquisition, valuing Junglee at more than $440 million; press reports put Flutter’s total spend above $200 million.
What each backer changed: 500 Startups and Velo Partners bought Junglee the runway to prove real-money rummy could be profitable. Flutter changed everything else — it gave Junglee a global operator’s compliance, technology and balance sheet, and it set the valuation benchmark that the 2025 impairment would later erase.
How it makes money
Real-money skill gaming earns its keep from the “rake,” not from beating players. The mechanics, until the 2025 ban:
- Money in — the rake/entry fee. Players deposit cash and join cash games or tournaments. Junglee took a platform fee (a percentage of the pot or entry fee); the rest was redistributed to winners. Junglee does not gamble against users, so revenue scales with volume of play, not luck.
- Money in — gross gaming revenue (GGR). The headline the industry watches is GGR: total stakes minus payouts to players. Data providers pegged Junglee’s annualised revenue at roughly $750 million as of mid-2025 on a GGR/turnover basis (ZoomInfo), while Gera had earlier spoken of gross gaming revenue in the hundreds of millions of dollars — figures that dwarf the Indian legal entity’s booked revenue, because much play flows through group-level accounting.
- Costs out. The big line items are user-acquisition marketing, payment-processing fees, prize liabilities, technology and anti-fraud, and — from October 2023 — a 28% GST levied on the full face value of deposits, not just the rake. That GST change compressed margins across the whole sector.
- Where the margin sat. Because Junglee was bootstrapped and rake-based, its margin came from retention and repeat play rather than subsidised acquisition. The part people get wrong: the platform’s “revenue” is a fee on activity, so the tax base (full deposits) grew far faster than the money Junglee actually kept.
The numbers
Junglee’s public financials are fragmented across a US parent, an Indian operating entity and group-level disclosures, so figures must be read with their source and definition attached. Two things are clear: the Indian entity was consistently profitable, and its booked profit was shrinking well before the ban. Figures below are ₹ crore, as reported; profit figures for the India entity are per Tracxn and revenue by year is only partially disclosed.
| Fiscal year | Revenue (₹ crore) | Net profit (₹ crore) |
| FY22 | Not separately disclosed | 69.0 (Tracxn) |
| FY23 | ~930 group (Inc42); India entity “over 500” for year to 31 Dec 2023 (Tofler) | 71.3 (Tracxn) |
| FY24 | Not separately disclosed | 48.8 (Tracxn) |
| FY25 (to 31 Mar 2025) | 100–500 band (Tracxn) | 28.9 (Tracxn) |
The trend that matters is the profit line: India-entity net profit roughly halved from ₹71.3 crore in FY23 to ₹28.9 crore in FY25 (Tracxn), consistent with the 28% GST hit from October 2023 biting into the sector even before the outright ban.
At the group level, the definitive numbers are Flutter’s. In Q3 2025 Flutter reported a net loss of $789 million, against $114 million a year earlier, driven largely by the India write-down. The impairment itself was $556 million, split as roughly $517 million of goodwill, $32 million of acquired and developed intangibles, and $7 million of other long-lived assets.
Where the money comes from
Junglee’s revenue was concentrated in ways that made the 2025 law existential rather than merely painful.
- By product: real-money rummy (Junglee Rummy) was the core earner, supported by fantasy sports (Howzat) and card games (Teen Patti, Poker). All of these are real-money formats, so the ban hit essentially the entire revenue base at once.
- By geography: India was effectively the whole business. Unlike Flutter’s diversified global book, Junglee had no meaningful non-India market to fall back on when the ban landed.
- By format: revenue depended on paid contests. The free-to-play content Junglee retained after August 2025 monetises through advertising and in-app purchases — a fraction of real-money rake economics.
- The surprise: Flutter’s own guidance quantified the loss. It projected a revenue hit of about $70 million in 2025, rising to roughly $250 million in 2026 and $310 million in 2027 — the clearest sign that India was a growing, not shrinking, contributor before the law.
The risks
Junglee’s risks were never mainly commercial; they were structural and regulatory, and they compounded.
- Regulatory single-point-of-failure (realised). The entire model rested on the “game of skill” exemption. The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 removed that exemption by defining any online game played for money — skill or chance — as a banned real-money game. One statute took the whole revenue base to zero, forcing Junglee into free-to-play and triggering Flutter’s $556 million write-off.
- Tax base risk. The 28% GST on full deposit value, effective October 2023, taxed activity rather than net revenue, structurally compressing margins. The India entity’s net profit falling from ₹71.3 crore (FY23) to ₹28.9 crore (FY25) tracks this pressure.
- Concentration risk. A single country and a single monetisation model (paid contests) meant no diversification cushion. When India closed, there was no other market to lean on and no non-real-money product of comparable scale.
- Workforce and continuity risk. With paid operations halted, the business supporting hundreds of staff lost its economic engine; Flutter’s India restructuring, reported alongside the impairment, put large-scale job losses on the table.
The takeaway
The transferable lesson from Junglee is not about rummy or even about gaming. It is that when a business’s right to exist depends on a single legal interpretation, no amount of operational excellence, profitability or blue-chip ownership can hedge that risk — only diversification can. Junglee did the hard things well: it bootstrapped to profit, sold to a global major at a premium, and kept its numbers black. None of it mattered when Parliament redefined the category. For any founder building in a legally contested space — gaming, crypto, lending, data — the durable moat is not market share or a strong balance sheet; it is a revenue base that survives the loss of any one permission. Junglee had exactly one permission, and in August 2025 it was withdrawn.
Frequently asked questions
Who owns Junglee Games?
Flutter Entertainment plc controls Junglee Games. Flutter acquired an initial 50.1% stake for $67.3 million (completion reported in early 2021), then increased its holding through further purchases toward 95%-plus, with total reported spend above $200 million.
Why did Junglee Games shut down its real-money games?
The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025, which received presidential assent on 22 August 2025, banned online real-money games and treated skill-based and chance-based games alike. Junglee ceased all paid operations in India and moved to free-to-play content only.
How much did Flutter lose on Junglee?
Flutter took a non-cash impairment charge of $556 million — about $517 million goodwill, $32 million intangibles and $7 million other assets. It also guided to revenue losses of roughly $70 million in 2025, $250 million in 2026 and $310 million in 2027.
Was Junglee Games profitable?
Yes. The Indian operating entity reported net profit every year for which data is available — about ₹71.3 crore in FY23 — though profit was declining, to roughly ₹28.9 crore by FY25 (per Tracxn), partly reflecting the 28% GST introduced in October 2023.
Who founded Junglee Games?
Ankush Gera founded Junglee Games in 2012, with an early founding team. Before Junglee, Gera built the software company Monsoon, which was acquired by Capital One.
Sources
Figures are as of September 2026. Currency converted at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026 (Trading Economics).
- Storyboard18 — “Flutter takes $556 million hit as Online Gaming Act forces Junglee shutdown,” November 2025
- Storyboard18 — “Flutter CEO Peter Jackson ‘extremely disappointed’ on money gaming ban,” November 2025
- Tribuna — “Flutter cuts 800 jobs as India’s real-money gaming ban triggers $556m impairment,” November 2025
- Lexology — “Behind the Ban: The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025,” 2025
- YourStory — “After $200M buyout, Flutter forced to hit pause on Junglee Rummy,” August 2025
- Inc42 — Junglee Games company profile (FY23 revenue), 2025–2026
- Tofler — Junglee Games India Private Limited financials (CIN U72200HR2011PTC114723), 2025
- Tracxn — Junglee Games India Private Limited profile and financials, 2026
- MarketScreener / Bar & Bench / Medianama — Flutter acquisition of Junglee Games stake, 2021
- Inc42 / CardsChat — Flutter stake step-up and Sachiko Gaming bolt-on, 2021–2022
- ZoomInfo — Junglee Games revenue and user estimate (as of June 2025)
- YourStory / NextBigWhat — Ankush Gera interviews on bootstrapping and gross gaming revenue, 2020
Found an error? Write to us and we’ll correct it in the open, dated, on the piece.