YouTube paid a reported $70 million in July 2021 for simsim, an Indian video-shopping app that was barely two years old. Twenty months later, on 31 March 2023, YouTube shut the same app down, after the entity behind it had spent close to ₹178.6 crore ($18.6 million, at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026, Trading Economics) in a single year to generate just ₹18.21 crore of revenue.
This is the story of how a seven-month-old startup selling saris and kitchenware through short vernacular videos became one of Google’s few disclosed acquisitions of an Indian consumer startup — and how, under a parent with effectively unlimited capital, it still could not make its unit economics work before the plug was pulled.
Quick facts
| Company | Simsim (legal entity: Simsim Technologies Private Limited, Gurgaon; later renamed SZS Tech Private Limited) |
| Founded | 2019; seed funding in April 2019, Series A in July 2019 |
| Founder(s) | Amit Bagaria, Kunal Suri and Saurabh Vashishtha (Bagaria and Vashishtha previously worked at Paytm) |
| Businesses | Vernacular, video-led social commerce app connecting small businesses, influencers and shoppers in Hindi, Tamil, Bengali and English |
| Latest FY revenue | ₹18.21 crore for FY22 (year to March 2022), up 64.5% year on year, as per Simsim’s MCA filings |
| Latest FY profit/loss | Net loss of ₹157.25 crore for FY22, roughly 3.5 times the prior year’s loss |
| Listed | Private; acquired by YouTube/Google in July 2021, and discontinued as a consumer app on 31 March 2023 |
| Market value / last valuation | Reported at more than $70 million at the July 2021 YouTube acquisition; $50.1 million at its February 2020 Series B |
| Key shareholders / CEO | Pre-acquisition: Accel, Shunwei Capital and Good Capital; co-founder Amit Bagaria led the company. Post-2021: wholly owned by Google/YouTube until the app’s shutdown |
What they do
Simsim ran a mobile app where influencers and small sellers recorded short videos in Hindi, Tamil, Bengali and English, demonstrating everyday products — clothing, kitchenware, jewellery, personal care — and viewers could buy directly from inside the video. The company positioned itself as a way for small offline businesses that had no real e-commerce presence to reach buyers in smaller Indian towns, using a locally spoken, trusted voice in place of a written product listing (TechCrunch, February 2020; TechCrunch, July 2021). Simsim itself sourced or aggregated inventory, ran fulfilment through third-party logistics partners, and paid the influencers a commission on the sales their videos generated (TechCrunch, February 2020). By its own account, more than 80% of its gross merchandise value came from tier 2, tier 3 and smaller towns rather than the metros most e-commerce apps chase first (Accel, accessed September 2026).
The origin
Amit Bagaria, Kunal Suri and Saurabh Vashishtha founded Simsim in 2019 out of Gurgaon. Bagaria and Vashishtha had both worked at Paytm’s e-commerce arm before starting the company (TechCrunch, July 2021; Fundzlab, accessed September 2026). The founding bet was narrow: Indian shoppers outside the big cities were not under-served by selection, they were under-served by trust and language. A product page in English, written by a brand’s marketing team, could not do what a familiar local voice speaking Hindi or Tamil could do — show a product being used, answer the obvious objection, and make the sale feel like a recommendation from someone the buyer already trusted.
That is also why Simsim built video-on-demand commerce before it built livestreaming. According to Accel, one of its earliest backers, the founders treated live shopping as a feature to add once the core video-and-buy loop worked, not as the starting product — a sequencing choice that let the company launch and iterate faster than a livestreaming-first rival would have (Accel, accessed September 2026).
The struggle years
Two problems threatened Simsim at very different points in its short life, and neither was ever fully solved.
The first showed up almost immediately after launch. Accel’s own account of the company’s growth records an average order value of about ₹250 and gross margins of roughly 20% in the platform’s early months — thin enough that basic categories like fashion and home goods could not carry the business on their own. Simsim’s response was to widen into new product categories, push private-label products with fatter margins, and specifically attack what the company internally called the “RTO problem” — the high rate of returned-to-origin shipments that eats into already slim margins on low-ticket orders shipped to small towns (Accel, accessed September 2026). None of this is documented as fully resolved; it is documented as the company’s continuing fight rather than a one-time fix.
The second, larger problem surfaced under Google’s ownership and proved fatal. In the financial year to March 2022, Simsim’s total expenses roughly tripled to ₹178.6 crore, from ₹57.3 crore the year before, while revenue from operations grew only 64.5%, to ₹18.21 crore. The net loss for the year came to ₹157.25 crore, about 3.5 times the previous year’s loss, and cumulative losses on the company’s books reached roughly ₹226 crore (Entrackr, February 2023). A separate account of Simsim’s 2022 performance put its loss for the calendar year at around $19 million — a different accounting period, but the same order of magnitude (Tubefilter, March 2023). That spending pattern, not any single external shock, is the direct run-up to the shutdown a year later.
- 2019-20 (early operations): Average order value of roughly ₹250 with gross margins near 20%, addressed through category expansion, private-label products and efforts to cut return-to-origin shipments (Accel, accessed September 2026)
- FY2021-22: Expenses roughly tripled to ₹178.6 crore against revenue of ₹18.21 crore; net loss widened about 3.5 times to ₹157.25 crore; cumulative losses reached roughly ₹226 crore (Entrackr, February 2023)
The turning point
The clearest before-and-after moment in Simsim’s history is the YouTube acquisition, announced on 19 July 2021. Neither company disclosed deal terms, but two people with knowledge of the transaction told TechCrunch that Simsim was valued at more than $70 million (TechCrunch, July 2021; The Register, July 2021). That sat well above the $50.1 million valuation TechCrunch reported for Simsim’s own February 2020 Series B, on total disclosed funding of about $17 million going into the deal (TechCrunch, July 2021).
Set the two sides of that moment next to each other: a two-year-old startup that had raised under $20 million and was still operating at a small revenue base got bought by one of the world’s largest technology companies for a sum more than four times its last independent valuation. YouTube framed the deal as a way to help small Indian businesses and retailers reach customers “in even more powerful ways,” at a time when the platform reported more than 450 million monthly active users in India and over 2,500 Indian creators with a million-plus subscribers (TechCrunch, July 2021). It did not commit to any specific integration timeline, and said Simsim would keep operating largely as before in the near term (TechCrunch, July 2021) — a continuity that, in the event, lasted less than two years.
The money behind it
Simsim’s fundraising was compact and fast: three rounds in under a year, then nothing more before it was acquired.
- Seed — about $1.5 million, April 2019: Early capital raised before the company had a full product built (Inc42/Tracxn aggregation, accessed September 2026)
- Series A — about $6.3 million, July 2019: Led by Accel India and Shunwei Capital, three months after the seed round, funding the initial product build and launch (YourStory, February 2020; TechCrunch, February 2020)
- Series B — $8 million, 13 February 2020: From Accel, Shunwei Capital and Good Capital, seven months after launch, earmarked for scaling to more languages and categories; this round valued Simsim at $50.1 million (TechCrunch, February 2020; YourStory, February 2020)
Total disclosed funding before the YouTube deal was about $17 million (TechCrunch, July 2021); trackers that include smaller or later instruments put lifetime funding at roughly $21.5 million across four rounds (Inc42, accessed September 2026). What each backer changed: Accel came in earliest and, by its own account, worked with the founders from before the company was formally incorporated, shaping the initial video-commerce model; Shunwei Capital co-led both the Series A and Series B, providing the bulk of the growth capital that took Simsim from a Gurgaon pilot to an app live in four languages; Good Capital joined at Series B, adding capital as the company pushed toward scale just before the pandemic disrupted much of Indian retail. No further outside funding round is documented after February 2020 — the July 2021 YouTube deal was Simsim’s only subsequent liquidity event.
How it makes money
Simsim’s own MCA filings, as reported by Entrackr, split its FY22 operating revenue of ₹18.21 crore into three disclosed streams:
- Marketplace services — ₹13.94 crore in FY22 (about 77% of operating revenue): up 69% from ₹8.24 crore in FY21; this is the core commission Simsim earned for the sales its videos and influencers generated for sellers on the platform (Entrackr, February 2023)
- Logistics services — ₹3.18 crore in FY22 (about 17% of operating revenue): more than doubled from ₹1.09 crore in FY21, reflecting fees charged for handling fulfilment and delivery on sellers’ behalf (Entrackr, February 2023)
- Promotional and support services — ₹1.09 crore in FY22 (about 6% of operating revenue): fees from sellers and brands for featured placement and platform support (Entrackr, February 2023)
On the cost side, the same filings show where that revenue went and then some. Employee benefit expenses roughly quadrupled to ₹59.83 crore in FY22, from ₹14.06 crore, including ₹7.28 crore of ESOP cost; advertising and promotional spend rose 3.4 times to ₹45.58 crore; consultancy charges rose 5.5 times to ₹23.92 crore, from ₹4.35 crore; influencer payouts — the commissions paid to the creators actually driving sales — grew about 80% to ₹9.42 crore; delivery charges came to ₹15.73 crore and cloud server charges to ₹6.31 crore (Entrackr, February 2023). No single published figure states Simsim’s exact take rate as a percentage of GMV, and that detail was not disclosed in any source reviewed for this piece — it is folded into the ₹13.94 crore marketplace-services line rather than broken out separately.
The part outsiders tend to get wrong is treating this as a simple commission marketplace. Simsim’s cost base under Google ownership looked much closer to a company still buying growth than one collecting a stable cut of sales: influencer payments, advertising and consultancy together ran to roughly ₹78.9 crore in FY22, more than four times the entire marketplace-services revenue those activities were meant to generate (Entrackr, February 2023).
The numbers
Simsim’s disclosed financials cover two full years as an operating consumer app under Google’s ownership; the company does not appear to have separately published a standalone FY23 figure before the app was discontinued partway through that financial year.
| Financial year (ending March) | Revenue (₹ crore) | Year-on-year change | Net profit/loss (₹ crore) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020-21 | 11.07 | — | Not separately disclosed in sources reviewed; FY22’s loss is reported as roughly 3.5 times FY21’s, implying a FY21 loss in the broad ₹40-45 crore range |
| FY2021-22 | 18.21 | Up 64.5% | Loss of 157.25 |
| FY2022-23 | Not disclosed in sources reviewed | — | Not disclosed; app discontinued 31 March 2023, partway through this financial year |
Source: Entrackr’s analysis of Simsim’s FY22 regulatory filings, published February 2023, which also restates the FY21 comparative figures. A separate outlet’s estimate of a roughly $19 million loss for calendar 2022 is consistent in scale with the FY22 rupee figure above, though it covers a different twelve-month period (Tubefilter, March 2023). No source reviewed for this piece disclosed Simsim’s financial results for any period after FY22.
Where the money comes from
Two splits stand out in what Simsim disclosed about where its business actually came from.
- By revenue stream (FY22): marketplace commissions made up about 77% of operating revenue, logistics fees about 17%, and promotional/support fees about 6% — a mix where the core commission business dominated, but two secondary services already contributed close to a quarter of the top line (Entrackr, February 2023)
- By geography and town size: more than 80% of gross merchandise value came from tier 2, tier 3 and smaller towns, rather than India’s largest metro markets (Accel, accessed September 2026)
The surprise is less in any one number than in what it implies about who Simsim was actually built for. Most Indian e-commerce growth stories lead with metro adoption and expand outward; Simsim’s own disclosed mix shows the opposite pattern from close to the start, with smaller towns as the core market rather than a later expansion target.
The risks
- Structurally thin unit economics: an average order value of roughly ₹250 and gross margins near 20% in the platform’s early years left little room to absorb the customer acquisition, delivery and influencer costs a video-commerce model requires at scale (Accel, accessed September 2026); this shows up directly in FY22, when total expenses of ₹178.6 crore ran nearly ten times operating revenue (Entrackr, February 2023)
- Dependence on a parent’s strategic priorities rather than its own trajectory: once wholly owned by Google, Simsim’s continuation depended on fitting into YouTube’s broader commerce roadmap rather than on its own standalone performance; when YouTube chose to route social commerce through creator affiliate programmes and native Shorts/livestream shopping features instead, the standalone app was discontinued regardless of its user base (TechCrunch, March 2023; Tubefilter, March 2023)
- Rising variable costs tied to the creator model itself: influencer payouts grew about 80% year on year in FY22, alongside a 3.4-times jump in advertising spend, showing that scaling the platform meant scaling payments to the same creators and ad channels that drove its core commission revenue — a cost structure that does not naturally get lighter with volume the way a pure software marketplace’s might (Entrackr, February 2023)
The takeaway
Being acquired by one of the largest technology companies on earth is not the same as having solved the business. Simsim’s unit economics — a low average order value, thin gross margins and creator payouts that scaled with revenue rather than shrinking as a share of it — were visible problems years before the YouTube deal, and they did not go away once Google’s balance sheet was behind the company; if anything, the spending got larger without the margin structure changing underneath it. The lesson that outlasts Simsim itself is a plain one: an acquisition changes who is paying the bills, not whether the underlying model makes money, and a parent company will eventually ask that question on its own timeline, not the founders’.
Frequently asked questions
What did simsim actually sell?
Simsim did not manufacture products itself. It ran a mobile app where influencers and small sellers posted short videos in Hindi, Tamil, Bengali and English demonstrating everyday products such as clothing, kitchenware and jewellery, and viewers could buy directly from within the video (TechCrunch, February 2020).
Who founded simsim and when?
Amit Bagaria, Kunal Suri and Saurabh Vashishtha founded Simsim in 2019 in Gurgaon. Bagaria and Vashishtha had both previously worked at Paytm’s e-commerce business (TechCrunch, July 2021).
How much did YouTube pay to acquire simsim?
Neither company disclosed the price, but people familiar with the deal told TechCrunch that Simsim was valued at more than $70 million when YouTube announced the acquisition on 19 July 2021 (TechCrunch, July 2021; The Register, July 2021).
Why did YouTube shut down simsim?
YouTube did not give a single explicit reason, but said it was discontinuing the standalone app in favour of building shopping features — including a creator affiliate programme — directly into YouTube’s main product, across long-form video, Shorts and livestreams. The shutdown followed a financial year in which Simsim’s expenses ran nearly ten times its revenue (TechCrunch, March 2023; Entrackr, February 2023).
How much funding did simsim raise before being acquired?
Simsim raised about $17 million across a seed round and two priced rounds between April 2019 and February 2020, from investors including Accel, Shunwei Capital and Good Capital, reaching a $50.1 million valuation at its February 2020 Series B (TechCrunch, July 2021; TechCrunch, February 2020).
Sources
Figures are as of September 2026. Currency converted at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026 (Trading Economics).
- TechCrunch, “7-month-old Simsim secures $16M for its social commerce in India”, February 2020
- YourStory, “Social commerce startup Simsim raises $16 Mn funding”, February 2020
- TechCrunch, “YouTube acquires Indian social commerce startup Simsim”, July 2021
- The Register, “YouTube acquiring Simsim”, July 2021
- Accel, “Building Social Commerce in India — simsim’s journey to acquisition by YouTube”, accessed September 2026
- Entrackr, “Google-owned Simsim spent Rs 178 Cr to make Rs 18 Cr in FY22”, February 2023
- Startup Story, “Simsim’s FY22: Spends Rs 178 Cr to Generate Rs 18 Cr Revenue under Google Ownership”, February 2023
- TechCrunch, “YouTube shutting down Indian social commerce app Simsim”, March 2023
- Tubefilter, “YouTube’s getting rid of Simsim, but says it’s still investing in ecommerce”, March 2023
- Inc42, “SimSim — Funding, Revenue & Investors”, accessed September 2026
- Fundzlab, “SimSim company profile”, accessed September 2026
Found an error? Write to us and we’ll correct it in the open, dated, on the piece.