Site icon The Invincible India

Startup Deep Dive : Zuddl — it grew 20x in eight months, then did not raise again for four years

The Invincible India Startup Deep Dive featured graphic for Zuddl.

In its first eight months, Zuddl’s revenue grew 20 times over and its team tripled from 20 people to 60, as the pandemic turned every conference, town hall and college orientation into a browser tab (company data reported by BW Disrupt and CityAirNews, June 2021). Four years after that sprint, the company that once out-grew its own hiring plans has not announced a single new funding round, even as its most famous rival in the same category, Hopin, went from a $7.75 billion valuation to selling its core product for $15 million upfront.

Zuddl is a Y Combinator-backed, India-founded events and webinar platform built by two people who came at the same problem from opposite ends: one had run physical events for a living, the other had never worked in events at all. Its story is less about a single dramatic pivot and more about a company that has had to keep re-justifying its existence twice over: once when the pandemic that created its market ended, and again as the wider virtual-events category it was born into was quietly written off by the venture capital that had funded it.

Quick facts

Company Zuddl (India operating entity: Joyn Zuddl Experiences Private Limited, CIN U92490TG2020FTC142797)
Founded May 2020, by two co-founders working out of Bengaluru and the US
Founder(s) Bharath Varma (CEO) and Vedha Sayyaparaju (CTO)
Businesses Modular SaaS for webinars, virtual, hybrid and onsite/field B2B events: ticketing, registration, attendee app, analytics, lead capture
Latest FY revenue India entity: ₹11.8 crore (approx. $1.23 million; $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026, Trading Economics), FY24 (year to 31 March 2024), down 12.0% year-on-year; global consolidated revenue not disclosed by the company
Latest FY profit/loss Not publicly disclosed for FY24; FY23 net profit margin reported at 5.12% for the India entity (Tofler, citing MCA filings)
Listed Private, unlisted
Market value / last valuation Not disclosed at last funding round (January 2022); one unverified third-party estimate of $54 million for 2024 could not be corroborated against a second source and is not relied on here
Key shareholders / CEO Bharath Varma (CEO, co-founder); institutional backers include Alpha Wave Incubation, Qualcomm Ventures, Y Combinator, GrowX and Waveform Ventures

What they do

Zuddl sells software that runs the entire lifecycle of a B2B event, regardless of its format: webinars, virtual conferences, hybrid programmes and fully in-person “field” events such as user conferences, job fairs and internal company gatherings. Its buyers are marketing, events and revenue-operations teams inside mid-market and enterprise companies who would otherwise stitch together five or six separate tools, one each for registration, ticketing, a streaming platform, a mobile app, badge printing and post-event analytics, and then try to reconcile the data manually. Zuddl’s pitch is that all of it, digital and physical, runs on one platform with one dataset, so a company running a hybrid annual conference can see a single attendee’s registration, session attendance, badge scan and lead-capture activity in one place rather than across disconnected systems (Zuddl product pages and company blog, accessed September 2026, company-stated). Customers named across the company’s own marketing materials and case studies at various points include Kellogg’s, Microsoft, Adobe, Google, BYJU’S, Razorpay and Nasscom (Zuddl Series A newsroom release, January 2022).

The origin

Bharath Varma was not new to events when he started Zuddl. In 2015 he founded Phoenix Live, a live-event management agency that grew into a team of more than 60 people across four cities and ran over 300 events for large clients including Microsoft, Google and Deloitte, according to his executive biography (Equilar ExecAtlas, accessed September 2026). That business was built entirely around people being physically in a room. Vedha Sayyaparaju came from a different world altogether: an MIT graduate in computer science who had worked on data infrastructure and search at Facebook, Pinterest and the fintech company Blend, with no background in the events industry at all (Zuddl author pages and YourStory people profile, accessed September 2026).

The two of them had reportedly discussed the idea of rebuilding event technology from scratch months before COVID-19 reached India, well before either of them knew the entire physical-events industry was about to be switched off overnight. When national lockdowns hit in March 2020, Varma’s live-event agency, dependent on people gathering in physical rooms, had no business left to run. Rather than wait for the industry to return to normal, the two co-founders started building software instead, launching Zuddl in May 2020 and joining Y Combinator’s Summer 2020 batch soon after (Zuddl about page and YC company profile, accessed September 2026). The founding insight, in effect, was that Varma understood exactly what an event organiser needed from the inside, having run one himself, while Sayyaparaju had the engineering background to build it as software rather than as a services business.

The struggle years

Zuddl’s hardest moments are less a list of individual crises than two structural shocks that hit the company and its founders at either end of the pandemic cycle.

The first came before Zuddl even existed as a company. Phoenix Live, Varma’s events agency, had built its entire revenue model on physical gatherings; when India’s COVID-19 lockdowns began in March 2020, that revenue effectively went to zero within weeks, since large in-person gatherings were banned outright. There was no pivot available inside the existing business; the founders instead had to abandon the agency model altogether and rebuild from nothing as a software company, a decision that put Zuddl into Y Combinator’s accelerator just months later (Equilar ExecAtlas executive bio and Zuddl about page, accessed September 2026).

The second shock arrived once the crisis that created Zuddl’s market began to fade. As vaccination drives progressed through 2022 and companies went back to hosting people in person, marketing budgets that had been diverted entirely into virtual-event software during 2020 and 2021 began flowing back toward travel, venues and physical production. The scale of that reversal is visible in what happened to the category’s best-funded player: Hopin, which had raised roughly $1 billion and been valued at $7.75 billion at its 2021 peak, sold its core events and engagement products to RingCentral for $15 million in upfront consideration in August 2023, with additional payments contingent on performance targets (TechCrunch, August 2023; RingCentral investor-relations press release, 2023). Zuddl was far smaller and never carried anything close to Hopin’s valuation, but the same demand reversal applied to it: a platform built and funded to run virtual-only events had to prove it could also run hybrid and fully in-person programmes, or watch its addressable market shrink under it. That is the pressure behind the company’s later push into “Onsite Solutions”, badge printing and field-event tools, features that would have made little sense for a purely virtual-events startup in 2020.

The turning point

The clearest before-and-after moment in Zuddl’s public record sits in the eight months between its $2 million seed round in October 2020 and a company update published in June 2021. Before: a fresh Y Combinator graduate with seed funding, a co-founder pair with no shared events-software track record, and a product barely a few months old. After: revenue up 20 times over that same window, headcount tripled from 20 to 60 people, more than 50 enterprise customers on the platform globally, and marquee logos including Nasscom, Microsoft, Grant Thornton and Cipla now running events on Zuddl rather than a patchwork of tools (BW Disrupt and CityAirNews, both reporting company-provided figures, June 2021). That eight-month stretch is also when Zuddl’s revenue mix already skewed international: more than 65% of revenue in that period came from outside India, an unusually export-heavy profile for a company barely a year old (CityAirNews, June 2021, company-stated). The traction built in this window is what set up the company’s Series A roughly seven months later, in January 2022, led by two growth-stage investors it had not previously worked with.

The money behind it

Zuddl has disclosed two institutional funding rounds:

Reported total funding varies by tracker: Tracxn lists $15.5 million across three rounds, Inc42 lists “$15.35 Mn+”, and PitchBook lists $17.3 million; the underlying two disclosed rounds ($2 million plus $13.35 million) add up to $15.35 million, so the higher PitchBook figure could not be corroborated against a second primary source and is noted here only as a range (Tracxn, Inc42 and PitchBook company profiles, accessed September 2026).

What each backer changed:

No valuation was disclosed for either round. A single third-party estimate research turned up, a $54 million figure from GetLatka for 2024, is explicitly labelled by GetLatka itself as a model estimate rather than a company-confirmed figure and could not be verified against a second source, so it is not treated as fact in this piece.

How it makes money

Zuddl runs a subscription-licensing model priced by organiser seat rather than by number of events or attendees, according to its own published pricing page (Zuddl pricing page, accessed September 2026, company-stated):

Where the margin sits: because organiser-seat pricing does not scale directly with event size, the direct costs that eat into margin are the ones tied to event volume and complexity rather than headcount, principally streaming and data infrastructure for large virtual audiences and the field-support and hardware side of onsite events (badge printers, check-in devices). The part people tend to get wrong is assuming a company like this charges like a webinar tool, by attendee count or by the number of events run; Zuddl’s own pricing structure charges for the size of the team running events, not the size of the audience attending them, which rewards customers who consolidate many events under one team rather than customers who run one enormous one-off event.

The numbers

Zuddl, the global company, does not publish audited financial statements. Its India operating subsidiary, Joyn Zuddl Experiences Private Limited, does file annual accounts with India’s Registrar of Companies, and the following figures are drawn from those filings as compiled by corporate-data platforms; they cover the India entity only and are not a substitute for global consolidated revenue, which the company has not disclosed.

Fiscal year India entity revenue Year-on-year change
FY23 (year to 31 Mar 2023) Reported in the ₹10-25 crore band Revenue up 40.34%; profit down 20.19% (Tofler, citing MCA filings, accessed September 2026)
FY24 (year to 31 Mar 2024) ₹11.8 crore (approx. $1.23 million) Down 12.0% (TheCompanyCheck, citing MCA filings, accessed September 2026)

Where the money comes from

The risks

The takeaway

Zuddl’s founders built their company on a piece of hard-earned knowledge: an events agency and a software company look nothing alike on a balance sheet, but they live or die by exactly the same forcing function, whether people can physically or virtually show up. The lesson that transfers well past events technology is what happened once that forcing function changed twice within four years. A crisis that hands a company overnight demand, as the pandemic did for every virtual-events startup in 2020, is not the same thing as a durable market; and a category that many well-funded competitors pile into during a boom rarely stays profitable for all of them once the boom ends. Zuddl’s response, expanding from a purely virtual product into a genuinely modular one that also runs physical events, is the kind of unglamorous, structural adaptation that rarely makes headlines the way a funding round does, but it is the difference between a company that only had a good pandemic and one that has a real, ongoing reason for enterprise buyers to keep paying it.

Frequently asked questions

Who founded Zuddl and when?

Zuddl was founded in May 2020 by Bharath Varma, who previously ran the live-event agency Phoenix Live, and Vedha Sayyaparaju, an MIT-trained engineer who had worked at Facebook, Pinterest and Blend. The company joined Y Combinator’s Summer 2020 batch shortly after launch.

How much funding has Zuddl raised, and who are its investors?

Zuddl has disclosed two rounds: a $2 million seed in October 2020 from Y Combinator and GrowX, and a $13.35 million Series A on 7 January 2022 led by Alpha Wave Incubation and Qualcomm Ventures, with GrowX and Waveform Ventures also participating. Total reported funding across trackers ranges from about $15.35 million to $17.3 million; no new institutional round has been announced since January 2022.

What is Zuddl’s current valuation?

Not publicly disclosed. No valuation was announced with the Series A, and a single third-party estimate of $54 million for 2024 is explicitly flagged by its publisher, GetLatka, as an unverified model estimate rather than a confirmed figure.

Is Zuddl profitable?

Not disclosed at the global company level. Its India operating subsidiary, Joyn Zuddl Experiences Private Limited, reported a 5.12% net profit margin in FY23 according to MCA-filing data compiled by Tofler, but FY24 profit figures for that entity were not publicly available, and this covers only the India unit, not global operations.

What makes Zuddl different from other virtual-event platforms?

Zuddl positions itself as a single, modular platform spanning webinars, virtual events, hybrid programmes and fully in-person “field” events, priced by organiser seat rather than by attendee or event count, so a customer running many events across formats manages them from one system rather than switching tools for each format.

Sources

Figures are as of September 2026. Currency converted at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026 (Trading Economics).

Found an error? Write to us and we’ll correct it in the open, dated, on the piece.

Exit mobile version