In FY25, IndiaMART InterMESH made a net profit of ₹551 crore ($57.4 million), up 65% over the year before, on revenue of ₹1,388 crore ($144.6 million). In the very next quarter, the company that calls itself India’s largest online B2B marketplace lost more paying suppliers than it signed up.
That is the puzzle sitting at the centre of IndiaMART today. A 29-year-old company that survived the dot-com crash, the 9/11 export shock and a 2008 pivot away from the very export business it was built on, is now profitable, dividend-paying and dominant in its category — and yet its core subscriber count, the paying suppliers who fund almost all of it, is shrinking. This is the story of how a Delhi directory business became a ₹9,900 crore listed company, why its numbers still look good, and why the company is racing to sell accounting software before that stops being true.
Quick facts
| Company | IndiaMART InterMESH Limited |
| Founded | 1 April 1996, New Delhi |
| Founders | Dinesh Agarwal and Brijesh Agrawal |
| Businesses | B2B marketplace (core); Busy Infotech accounting software (wholly owned subsidiary); minority stake in Vyapar |
| FY25 revenue | ₹1,388 crore, up 16% year on year |
| FY25 net profit | ₹551 crore, up 65% year on year |
| Listed | 4 July 2019, NSE and BSE (BSE: 542726) |
| Market value | approximately ₹9,900–10,000 crore as of 18 September 2026 |
| Key people | Dinesh Agarwal (Chairman and Managing Director); founders and early PE investors Intel Capital, Amadeus Capital and Accion together hold a meaningful minority stake post-IPO |
What they do
IndiaMART runs a digital directory that connects Indian manufacturers, wholesalers and service providers with the businesses that want to buy from them. A supplier builds a storefront, lists its products or services against one of roughly 98,000 categories, and pays a subscription to show up higher and more often when a buyer searches or posts a requirement. A buyer — anyone from a small trader hunting for packaging machinery to a factory sourcing steel pipe — searches the platform for free, posts a requirement, and IndiaMART routes that enquiry to matching suppliers. The company does not warehouse goods, does not run logistics, and mostly does not touch the transaction itself; it sells visibility and leads, and increasingly, on top of that, it sells the accounting and billing software those same small businesses need to run their operations day to day.
The origin
Dinesh Agarwal was a computer science graduate from HBTI Kanpur who had worked on Indian Railways’ reservation systems before moving to the United States with HCL Technologies. There he watched the early commercial internet take off and concluded that Indian exporters — thousands of small manufacturers with no way to be found by an overseas buyer — were the obvious use case nobody had built for. India had roughly 15,000 internet users when public access arrived in 1995. Agarwal returned with about ₹40,000 in savings and, with his cousin Brijesh Agrawal, registered IndiaMART InterMESH on 1 April 1996 as an online directory and website-building service for exporters and small and medium enterprises. The first paid listing came only in 1998, two years in — the founding insight had to wait for a market that could actually pay for it.
The struggle years
The company’s first real test arrived with the dot-com crash of 2000–01. IndiaMART stayed profitable through it — Agarwal told a Delhi business magazine at the time that the company was “alive and kicking and profitable,” a claim the publication verified and put on its cover — but the reprieve was short. The September 2001 attacks in the United States triggered the war in Afghanistan and a wave of American protectionism that hit Indian exporters directly, since IndiaMART’s whole model at the time was built around connecting Indian sellers to overseas, largely American, buyers. Export enquiries, the company’s lifeblood, fell sharply through 2001–02. IndiaMART responded by not laying off staff and doubling down on trust features instead — it launched TrustSEAL, a supplier verification service, in 2003, and briefly ran its own payment platform from 2005 before shutting it in 2009 when it didn’t gain traction.
The deeper crisis came later in the decade and was structural rather than cyclical. By 2007–08, a strengthening rupee and the rise of Chinese manufacturing were squeezing the very export-led SMEs IndiaMART served, and the export-directory model was visibly plateauing after more than a decade of being the company’s entire reason for existing. Pivoting away from your founding business, thirteen years in, with competitors circling the same SMEs domestically, is the kind of decision that kills companies that get it wrong.
The turning point
IndiaMART’s answer was to turn the directory inward: instead of only connecting Indian sellers to the world, it would connect Indian businesses to each other, betting that domestic B2B trade was a bigger and stickier market than exports had ever been. The company raised funding from Bennett, Coleman & Co (the Times Group) in 2007 and then from Intel Capital, its first significant institutional backer, as it rebuilt around this domestic thesis. The bet paid off structurally: a domestic marketplace has a network effect exports never gave IndiaMART, because in India’s fragmented SME economy, the same firm that buys raw material from one supplier is very often a supplier to someone else on the same platform — every buyer is a potential seller. IndiaMART used the fresh capital to build out field sales, and by 2010 it had opened offices in more than 50 cities, chasing industrial clusters like Ludhiana, Surat and Tirupur directly rather than waiting for them to find a website. Revenue that had been roughly flat through the export slowdown reached about ₹300 crore by FY16, with the company guiding to 30% growth for the following year — the clearest sign that the domestic pivot, not the original export idea, was what actually built the business IndiaMART is today.
The money behind it
IndiaMART raised capital sparingly compared to most Indian internet companies of its era, and almost all of it came from a small set of long-term financial backers rather than the venture-growth rounds that defined its consumer-internet peers. Bennett, Coleman & Co (Times Group) put in early capital around 2007 to help fund the domestic pivot. Intel Capital followed as the company’s most consequential institutional investor, backing the shift to field sales from 2009 and staying on the register through multiple rounds. Amadeus Capital Partners and Quona Capital led a further round in March 2016 alongside existing investors including Intel Capital and Accion, at a point when the company had already turned durably profitable — an unusual position for an Indian internet company to IPO from. IndiaMART listed on the NSE and BSE on 4 July 2019 through a ₹475 crore ($49.5 million) initial public offering priced at ₹973 a share, almost entirely an offer for sale by existing shareholders including Intel Capital, Amadeus Capital and Accion rather than a primary fundraise for the company itself — a detail that tells you the company didn’t need the IPO money to survive, only to give its early backers an exit. The stock closed its debut session about 34% above the issue price. Since listing, IndiaMART has redeployed its own cash rather than raise fresh external capital: it bought full ownership of accounting-software maker Busy Infotech for ₹500 crore in a deal announced in January 2022 and completed that April, and it has invested roughly ₹92.75 crore across two rounds into Vyapar, a rival cloud accounting app, taking a minority stake without folding it into its own balance sheet.
How it makes money
The business is a subscription, not a commission. IndiaMART does not take a cut of the transactions it helps arrange; it charges suppliers an annual fee, tiered roughly as Silver, Gold and Platinum, for a mix of a better storefront, more or better-qualified leads, and priority placement when a buyer searches. Buyers pay nothing to search or post requirements, which is what keeps the volume of enquiries — and therefore the value suppliers get for their subscription — high. The part outsiders consistently get wrong is assuming IndiaMART operates like an e-commerce company that earns on order value; it earns instead like a classifieds or directory business, closer in structure to a Yellow Pages that changed with the internet, where the customer is the seller being listed rather than the buyer using the listing. Because it is a subscription collected largely upfront and recognised over the life of the plan, deferred revenue — money already collected for service not yet delivered — sits on the balance sheet as a cushion; that figure stood at roughly ₹2,014 crore as of the June 2026 quarter, up 16% year on year, which is one reason profit can keep climbing even in a quarter when new supplier additions slow. Costs sit mostly in employee expense, since converting an enquiry into a paying subscriber and then renewing that subscriber every year requires a large, largely field-based sales and account-management team; standalone EBITDA margin was about 39% in FY25, a level few subscription businesses of this size manage in India.
The numbers
Revenue has compounded steadily since listing, but profit has not moved in a straight line — FY23 is the exception worth noting.
| Year (₹ crore) | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
| Revenue | 753 | 985 | 1,197 | 1,388 |
| Net profit | 298 | 284 | 334 | 551 |
Revenue grew every year, roughly 31% in FY23, 22% in FY24 and 16% in FY25 — a deceleration worth watching in its own right. Profit, though, actually fell about 5% in FY23 even as revenue jumped, because total expenses rose more than 63% that year: employee costs alone climbed 58% to ₹424.7 crore as IndiaMART hired aggressively, and the year’s numbers also absorbed one-time costs from completing the Busy Infotech and Finlite Technologies acquisitions. Profit then recovered sharply, rising 18% in FY24 and 65% in FY25, helped by moderating cost growth and the pricing increases IndiaMART pushed through its Gold and Platinum tiers. By Q1 FY27 (the quarter to June 2026), revenue growth had slowed further to 11% year on year on ₹414 crore, with net profit up 12% to ₹172 crore — margins holding even as the pace of top-line growth cools.
Where the money comes from
The core marketplace still does almost all the work: standalone (marketplace) revenue was around 96% of FY25’s consolidated total, with Busy Infotech’s accounting-software business contributing roughly 4–5%, growing faster in percentage terms off a small base — its revenue rose 28% year on year in the March 2025 quarter. Within the marketplace itself, the split that matters is not geography — IndiaMART is now overwhelmingly a domestic, India-only business, the export orientation it was founded on having been deliberately abandoned nearly two decades ago — but supplier concentration. The company’s own disclosures show its top 10% of paying suppliers, the larger and more established sellers on Gold and Platinum plans, generate roughly 47% of total revenue. The surprise is how upside-down that makes the company’s growth math: IndiaMART’s near-term revenue increasingly depends on getting a shrinking pool of existing large suppliers to pay more per year — average revenue per user rose from about ₹44,000 in FY21 to roughly ₹66,000 by FY26 — rather than on adding new ones, because the number of paying suppliers overall has barely moved.
The risks
The clearest risk is sitting in the subscriber count itself. IndiaMART’s paying supplier base was about 218,000 in the June 2026 quarter, a net decline of roughly 1,850 from the prior quarter, continuing a run of flat-to-negative quarters that followed a Q4 FY25 net loss of about 1,200 paying suppliers. Management has attributed this to elevated churn in the entry-level Silver subscription tier — monthly churn there has been reported climbing from roughly 2–3% to as high as 4–7% — even as it pushes price increases through the higher Gold and Platinum tiers that fund most of its revenue. If churn at the base keeps rising while the company leans harder on price increases at the top, the model works for a few more years and then runs out of suppliers willing to pay more. Second, competition has intensified from multiple directions at once: Alibaba.com for cross-border sourcing, TradeIndia domestically, and Udaan and other wholesale platforms in adjacent categories, all competing for the same SME supplier’s marketing rupee, even though IndiaMART’s own scale — it has quoted an approximate 60% share of India’s organised B2B marketplace category — remains well ahead of any single rival. Third, IndiaMART has carried a reputational and regulatory overhang since 2018, when the US Trade Representative placed it on its “Notorious Markets” list alongside Alibaba, citing rights holders’ complaints about counterfeit goods and, in some cases, illegal pharmaceuticals listed on the platform; the company has since improved complaint response times according to some rights holders, but the underlying listing has not been removed, and it is a live liability if Indian or foreign regulators tighten intermediary-liability rules for online marketplaces.
The takeaway
IndiaMART’s story is a reminder that a founder betting on the wrong customer for a decade and a half is recoverable, provided the pivot happens before the balance sheet forces it — the company spent thirteen years building an export directory before admitting the real opportunity was domestic trade between Indian businesses, and it survived to make that call on its own terms rather than under creditor pressure. The harder lesson is what comes after a pivot succeeds: a subscription business built on network effects can look extremely healthy on profit and margin while its actual base of paying customers quietly erodes, because raising prices on your most loyal, highest-value subscribers can mask base erosion in the income statement for years before it shows up as a growth problem. Reading a subscription company’s headline profit without checking whether the number of people actually paying is going up or down is the mistake IndiaMART’s own investors are now learning, in real time, to stop making.
Frequently asked questions
What does IndiaMART actually do?
IndiaMART runs an online B2B directory and marketplace that connects Indian suppliers — manufacturers, wholesalers and service providers — with business buyers searching for products or posting sourcing requirements. Suppliers pay a subscription for a storefront and leads; buyers use the platform for free.
Who founded IndiaMART and when?
Dinesh Agarwal and his cousin Brijesh Agrawal founded IndiaMART InterMESH on 1 April 1996 in New Delhi, originally as a website-building and export-directory service for Indian small and medium enterprises.
Is IndiaMART profitable?
Yes. IndiaMART has been profitable for most of its history, including through the dot-com crash, and reported a consolidated net profit of ₹551 crore on revenue of ₹1,388 crore for FY25, a year ended 31 March 2025.
When did IndiaMART go public, and did it raise fresh capital?
IndiaMART listed on the NSE and BSE on 4 July 2019 through a ₹475 crore initial public offering priced at ₹973 a share. The IPO was almost entirely an offer for sale by existing investors, including Intel Capital, Amadeus Capital and Accion, rather than a primary raise for the company.
Why is IndiaMART’s paying supplier count falling?
The company has reported rising monthly churn in its entry-level Silver subscription tier, alongside price increases in its higher Gold and Platinum tiers; the paying supplier base fell to roughly 218,000 by the June 2026 quarter, a net decline from the prior quarter, even as revenue and profit kept growing.
Sources
Figures are as of September 2026. Currency converted at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026 (Trading Economics).
- IndiaMART InterMESH, Q4 FY25 Investor Presentation, investor.indiamart.com, April 2025
- IndiaMART InterMESH, Q4FY25 & FY25 results announcement, X (formerly Twitter) official account, April 2025
- Entrepreneur India, “IndiaMART Closes FY25 With a Net Profit of INR 181 Crore,” April 2025
- Screener.in, Indiamart Intermesh Ltd consolidated financials, accessed September 2026
- Stockanalysis.com, IndiaMART InterMESH (NSE: INDIAMART) market capitalisation, 18 September 2026
- Inc42, “IndiaMART’s FY23 Net Profit Dips 5% To INR 297 Cr As Expenses Zoom,” July 2022
- Business Standard, “IndiaMART InterMESH declines as 66% YoY rise in expenses hits bottomline,” July 2022
- Investing.com, “IndiaMART Q1 FY27 slides: margins hold as growth moderates,” August 2026
- Viestories, “IndiaMART Q1 FY27 Results: Net Profit Rises 12% to ₹172 Crore, Revenue Grows 11%,” July 2026
- Whalesbook, “IndiaMART Revenue Surges 14% in Q4 Amid Supplier Base Decline,” 2026
- Whalesbook, “IndiaMART’s Core Churn Challenges FY27 Outlook Amid Software Strength,” 2026
- Wikipedia, “IndiaMART,” accessed September 2026
- Entrackr, “How IndiaMart survived dot com burst, 9/11, 2008 crisis,” July 2017
- Business Standard, “IndiaMart’s Rs 475-cr IPO to open on June 24; price band fixed at Rs 970-973 per share,” June 2019
- Business Standard, “IndiaMART InterMESH ends debut session with 34% gain over issue price,” July 2019
- Amadeus Capital, “India’s largest online marketplace IndiaMART raises Series C Funding,” March 2016
- corporate.indiamart.com, “IndiaMART to acquire Busy Infotech for Rs 500 crores,” January 2022
- corporate.indiamart.com, “Why IndiaMART spent over Rs 900 crore on acquiring startups,” March 2022
- Business Standard, “Indiamart participates in Series B Investment Round of Vyapar,” January 2022
- Entrackr, “USTR places IndiaMart, Alibaba on American Notorious Markets List,” January 2018
- The Tribune, “IndiaMART and four other Indian markets figure in US Notorious Markets list,” 2021
Found an error? Write to us and we’ll correct it in the open, dated, on the piece.

