Startup Deep Dive : Stashfin — the credit-line lender that swung to profit then slipped back

Stashfin has pushed more than ₹13,000 crore (about $1.56 billion, company-stated, at the exchange rates of the time) in credit to Indians who mostly could not get a card from a bank, and in the financial year to March 2024 its Singapore parent turned its first real profit. One year later the same parent slipped back into the red, with group revenue down nearly 15% and a total comprehensive loss of $1.33 million in FY25.

That is the tension at the centre of Stashfin, a Delhi-born digital lender built by a former Goldman Sachs and General Atlantic banker who could not, on landing back in India, get a credit card himself. The brand sits on top of two Indian companies and one Singapore holding company, lends unsecured to blue-collar workers and armed-forces personnel, and has raised close to half a billion dollars in equity and debt. It also runs a business where a single bad-loan line, impairment, ate more than half of one year’s revenue. This is the story of how far a credit-line card can travel in India, and how quickly the economics can turn when the loan book sours.

Quick facts

What Stashfin does

Stashfin is a digital lender that gives small, flexible loans to Indians the formal banking system tends to skip. Its signature product is a credit-line card: a customer is approved for a limit, then draws only what is needed, and pays interest only on the amount used rather than the full sanction.

• Loans and credit lines run from about ₹1,000 to ₹5 lakh, with tenures up to 36 months and rates advertised from 11.99% a year (Inc42).
• Incremental drawdown: customers can withdraw as little as ₹1,000 and are charged interest only on the utilised amount, not the sanctioned limit (Inc42).
• Target customers are underserved earners, including blue-collar workers and, at the outset, people aged 23-38 earning under $500 a month, underwritten on alternative and mobile-banking data (TechCrunch).
• A dedicated product, the Sentinel Program, lends to serving armed-forces personnel and veterans and made up about 20% of the portfolio (Inc42).
• The lending is originated and disbursed by group NBFC Akara Capital Advisors, while EQX Analytics builds and runs the Stashfin app and underwriting stack (Acuité rating rationale; company disclosures).

The origin

The founding insight came from a personal wall. Tushar Aggarwal had spent years in finance abroad, at Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, General Atlantic and Everstone, and returned to India only to discover that a thick international CV counted for little with an Indian credit bureau. Without a domestic credit history, even a well-paid former banker struggled to get a simple credit card. If the system could not price him, he reasoned, it certainly was not pricing the tens of millions of Indians with thinner files and smaller pay cheques.

That gap became Stashfin. Aggarwal built the company in 2016 with Shruti Aggarwal, a chartered accountant and Columbia graduate who leads finance, and Parikshit Chitalkar, whose background is in product, risk and data analytics. The bet was that conventional underwriting, which leans on a bureau score most first-time borrowers do not have, could be replaced by alternative signals drawn from a smartphone and a bank statement. Rather than lend against a score, Stashfin would read behaviour. The credit-line card, letting a borrower take a little and repeat, was designed to build a relationship and a repayment record at the same time, turning a first ₹5,000 draw into the start of a file the borrower had never been able to create.

The struggle years

Lending to thin-file borrowers is a business that loses money before it makes any, because every rupee lent has to be funded, and every borrower who does not repay lands directly on the profit-and-loss account. Stashfin’s early years show exactly that shape: revenue climbing while the group bled, as the cost of capital and the cost of bad loans arrived ahead of scale.

• The India platform entity, EQX Analytics, posted operating revenue of just ₹107.0 crore in FY22, rising to ₹155.5 crore ($16.2 million; $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026, Trading Economics) in FY23, a 45.3% increase, but with profit after tax of only ₹1.1 crore in FY23 on expenses of ₹153.6 crore (Inc42; thekredible, from MCA filings).
• At the group level, Singapore parent Morus Technologies reported a total comprehensive loss of $13.2 million in FY23 (restated from a $17.7 million loss), on revenue of about $42 million (DealStreetAsia; Fintech News Singapore).
• DealStreetAsia reported that losses at the parent widened more than five-fold in FY23 as employee costs surged, the classic strain of a lender staffing up and funding a growing book before the interest income compounds (DealStreetAsia).
• Building the machinery was slow: the founders spent roughly three and a half years developing the underwriting and technology stack before scale arrived (TechCrunch).

The struggle here was not a single near-death moment but a structural one. A lender to the underserved cannot charge enough to cover early losses without becoming predatory, so it has to survive on outside capital until the book is large and seasoned enough to pay for itself. For several years, Stashfin was funding that survival.

The turning point

The turn was FY24, the year the group finally showed that the model could make money at scale. Morus Technologies swung from a $13.2 million comprehensive loss to a $2.6 million comprehensive profit, and it did so on the back of a lending book that had grown large enough for interest income to overwhelm early costs.

The numbers on either side of the turn are stark. Group revenue jumped 139% to $100.3 million in FY24 from about $42 million in FY23, with interest income alone tripling to $77.2 million; service and other fees added $5.1 million. In rupee terms, Inc42 reported group revenue of about ₹800 crore and net profit of ₹68 crore for FY24, the gap between that net figure and the $2.6 million total comprehensive profit reflecting other comprehensive items below the net line. But the same year exposed the fragility underneath: impairment losses on loans reached $52.6 million, more than half of all revenue, and finance costs were $18.8 million. FY24 proved Stashfin could grow revenue fast and touch profit, and, in the same breath, that its earnings live or die by how much of the book goes bad.

The money behind it

Stashfin has raised close to half a billion dollars, but the shape matters more than the headline: much of it is debt to fund the loan book, not equity to fund the company. Estimates of the total vary by how debt lines are counted, from about $424 million (Inc42) to roughly $459 million (Tracxn).

• Series C, June 2022: $70 million in equity plus $200 million in debt, valuing the company at $700-800 million, up from roughly $135 million at the prior round (TechCrunch).
• 2025 debt: about ₹78.8 crore ($9.3 million) raised in tranches from January 2025 via listed NCDs, pass-through certificates and commercial paper, from Northern Arc, Coinmen Special Opportunities Fund, Asvanta, Infixin and others (Inc42, May 2025).
• Retail bonds: group NBFC Akara Capital became one of the first fintech NBFCs to offer non-convertible debentures at a ₹10,000 face value, opening its bond issuance to retail investors (Outlook Business).

What the backers changed:

• Tencent and existing backers Altara Ventures, Kravis Investment Partners and Snow Leopard anchored the cap table as returning investors through the 2022 round (TechCrunch).
• Uncorrelated Ventures, Abstract Ventures and Fasanara Capital financed the 2022 equity round, with Fasanara a recurring lending and venture partner to the business (TechCrunch; Fasanara Capital).
• Debt providers such as Northern Arc are, for a lender, as strategic as equity: they supply the raw material, cheaper capital that Stashfin re-lends at a spread (Inc42).

How it makes money

Stashfin makes money the way any lender does, on the spread between what it pays for capital and what it charges borrowers, plus fees, minus the loans that never come back. The credit-line structure is designed to keep borrowers drawing repeatedly, which lifts utilisation and lifetime value.

• Money in: interest income is the engine, $77.2 million of FY24’s group revenue; on top sit application and processing fees, transaction charges, late-payment penalties and cross-sold products (Fintech News Singapore; Inc42).
• The spread: Stashfin borrows wholesale from banks, NBFCs and bond investors and lends to consumers at rates from 11.99% upward, keeping the difference (Inc42).
• Costs out: the two dominant lines are finance costs ($18.8 million in FY24) and, decisively, loan impairments ($52.6 million in FY24); employee benefits were about $14 million (Fintech News Singapore).
• The repeat engine: a reported repeat-loan rate of about 90% means acquisition cost is spread across many draws per customer, improving unit economics over time (Inc42).
• The part people get wrong: revenue growth is the easy half. For an unsecured lender, the number that decides profitability is the impairment line, and in FY24 it consumed more than half of revenue, so a small rise in defaults can erase the entire margin.

The numbers

Three years of the group’s consolidated accounts (Morus Technologies) tell the clearest story: a loss, a swing to profit, then a slide back. Figures are as reported by DealStreetAsia and Fintech News Singapore from the group’s financial statements, in US dollars, the currency the group reports in.

• FY24 revenue grew 139% year on year and the group turned its first comprehensive profit, $2.6 million (DealStreetAsia).
• FY25 revenue fell nearly 15% and the group posted a $1.33 million comprehensive loss (DealStreetAsia).
• The India platform entity, EQX Analytics, reported operating revenue of ₹155.5 crore in FY23 (up 45.3% from ₹107.0 crore in FY22) with profit after tax of ₹1.1 crore (Inc42; thekredible, from MCA filings).
• Company-stated India metrics for the nine months to December 2024 (9M FY25) showed total revenue of ₹585 crore and an “adjusted pre-tax profit” of ₹90 crore, a flattering, non-standard measure that sits oddly next to the group’s full-year comprehensive loss (Inc42).

Where the money comes from

Stashfin’s revenue is overwhelmingly interest on a growing pile of small, unsecured consumer loans, spread across the country and skewed toward salaried and blue-collar borrowers rather than metros alone.

• By product: interest income dominates, at $77.2 million of the FY24 group total, with fees and penalties the smaller balance (Fintech News Singapore).
• By segment: the Sentinel Program for armed-forces personnel and veterans accounted for about 20% of the portfolio, an unusually defensible niche given the stability of military salaries (Inc42).
• By scale of book: assets under management were about ₹2,000 crore in FY24, with disbursals of over ₹3,500 crore that year and cumulative disbursals crossing ₹13,000 crore ($1.56 billion) since inception (Inc42).
• By reach: the company cited more than 40 million app downloads, about 40 lakh approved users across 1,000-plus cities and roughly 30 lakh active customers (Inc42).
• The surprise: for a self-styled neobank, the money is almost entirely old-fashioned lending spread; the app, the card and the data are distribution and underwriting, not separate revenue lines.

The risks

• Credit losses can swallow the margin. Impairment of $52.6 million in FY24 was more than half of group revenue. Because Stashfin lends unsecured to thin-file borrowers, a modest rise in defaults, from a macro shock or looser underwriting, flows straight to the bottom line, as the FY25 swing back to a comprehensive loss illustrates (Fintech News Singapore; DealStreetAsia).
• Revenue has already proved it can shrink. Group revenue fell nearly 15% in FY25 after doubling the year before, showing the growth is not linear and may reflect tighter lending or slower disbursal; a lender that pauses growth to protect quality also shrinks its interest income (DealStreetAsia).
• Funding dependence and cost of capital. The model runs on continuous access to wholesale debt. If rates rise or lenders retrench, Stashfin’s spread compresses; its repeated small debt raises through 2025 show how constantly the book must be refinanced (Inc42).
• Regulatory exposure. As an RBI-registered NBFC lending digitally and now pursuing UPI-based credit via a TPAP licence, Stashfin sits squarely inside the central bank’s tightening digital-lending and unsecured-credit rules, where changes to pricing, disclosure or risk-weighting can reshape the economics overnight (Inc42; RBI framework).

The takeaway

Stashfin’s lesson is that in lending, growth and profit are different sports, and the scoreboard is the impairment line. The company built a genuine product, a credit-line card that reads behaviour instead of a bureau score, and it reached millions of borrowers the banks would not touch, disbursing over ₹13,000 crore in the process. That was the easy, visible achievement. The harder, quieter one is keeping the loans good: in FY24 the group finally turned a profit, and in FY25, on lower revenue, it slipped back. For any lender chasing the underserved, the temptation is to treat rising disbursals as success. Stashfin’s numbers are a reminder that a loan is only revenue until it is a loss, and that the business is won or lost not when the money goes out, but when it is supposed to come back.

Frequently asked questions

What is Stashfin and who runs it?

Stashfin is a digital consumer lender best known for its credit-line card. The brand is operated by EQX Analytics Private Limited (the technology platform, incorporated in New Delhi in 2016) with lending done through group NBFC Akara Capital Advisors, all under Singapore parent Morus Technologies. It was founded by Tushar Aggarwal, Shruti Aggarwal and Parikshit Chitalkar.

How much has Stashfin raised and at what valuation?

Estimates of total funding range from about $424 million (Inc42) to roughly $459 million (Tracxn) across equity and debt. Its June 2022 Series C brought $70 million in equity and $200 million in debt and valued the company at $700-800 million, up from about $135 million previously (TechCrunch).

Is Stashfin profitable?

It has been inconsistent. The group parent, Morus Technologies, swung to a $2.6 million total comprehensive profit in FY24 after a $13.2 million loss in FY23, then reported a $1.33 million comprehensive loss in FY25 as revenue fell nearly 15% (DealStreetAsia).

Who does Stashfin lend to?

It targets underserved borrowers, including blue-collar and thin-file customers underwritten on alternative data, offering loans and credit lines from ₹1,000 to ₹5 lakh. A dedicated Sentinel Program serves armed-forces personnel and veterans and made up about 20% of the portfolio (Inc42; TechCrunch).

Is Stashfin going public?

Some trade press has described Stashfin as IPO-bound, but the company has not disclosed a public-listing timeline as of May 2025 (Inc42). It has instead raised small tranches of debt and is expanding into UPI-based credit via a TPAP licence.

Sources

Figures are as of September 2026. Currency converted at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026 (Trading Economics).

• TechCrunch, “Neobank Stashfin raises $270 million, tops $700 million valuation” (June 2022)
• DealStreetAsia, “Stashfin parent slips into loss as FY25 revenue drops nearly 15%” (2025)
• DealStreetAsia, “Stashfin’s parent swings to profit in FY24 as interest income triples” (2024)
• DealStreetAsia, “Losses at Stashfin’s parent widen over 5X in FY23 as employee costs surge” (2023)
• Fintech News Singapore, “Stashfin’s Parent Company Returns to Profitability in FY2024” (2024)
• Inc42, “How Consumer Credit-Focussed NBFC Stashfin Achieved 4x Growth In Revenue In Three Years” (2024-2025)
• Inc42, “Exclusive: Stashfin Raises INR 79 Cr Debt From Northern Arc, Others” (May 2025)
• Inc42 and thekredible, Stashfin / EQX Analytics financials pages, from MCA filings (2026)
• Acuité Ratings, Akara Capital Advisors Private Limited rating rationale (2022)
• Outlook Business, “Stashfin parent Akara Capital becomes 1st fintech NBFC to offer NCDs at face value of Rs 10,000” (2024)
• Zauba Corp / cleartax, EQX Analytics Private Limited (CIN U67190DL2016PTC290928) incorporation record
• Tracxn, Stashfin and EQX Analytics company, funding and investor profiles (2026)
• Trading Economics, USD/INR reference rate (18 September 2026)

Found an error? Write to us and we’ll correct it in the open, dated, on the piece.