Startup Deep Dive : Droom — the Rs 3,000 crore IPO that still hasn’t happened

Droom calls itself the platform that fixed trust in India’s used-vehicle trade, built on an AI pricing engine it says is licensed in 38 countries. Its founder has been talking about taking the company public since November 2021, when Droom filed a draft prospectus for a ₹3,000 crore IPO (about $312.5 million at ₹96 = $1).

Five years, one withdrawn IPO and one 70% valuation cut later, Droom is still a private company. Revenue collapsed 66% to ₹85.4 crore in FY24, then rebounded 88% to ₹168.5 crore the following year, according to regulatory filings reported by Inc42 and Entrackr — a swing that says as much about how thin the base has become as it does about any recovery.

Quick facts

What they do

Droom runs an online marketplace where individuals and dealers list used and new vehicles for sale, spanning cars, two-wheelers, commercial vehicles and, per the company’s own claims, dozens of other categories from planes to farm equipment. Around the core listings business it has built a set of paid tools aimed at the specific trust problem of buying a used vehicle sight unseen: a pricing benchmark, a physical inspection product, a vehicle-history record and a financing arm. The customer is anyone trying to price, inspect, finance or move a used vehicle in India, plus the dealers who pay to reach them.

The origin

Sandeep Aggarwal did not start in automobiles. He trained as an equity research analyst on Wall Street, covering internet stocks, before founding ShopClues, one of India’s early online marketplaces, in 2011. In July 2013, while still running ShopClues, he was arrested by the FBI over insider-trading allegations dating back to his analyst years — a case that would shadow him for years and only formally close after Droom was already established (Moneylife; Business Standard, September 2017). He started Droom in April 2014, initially out of Silicon Valley, with a narrower thesis than a general marketplace: used-vehicle buyers in India had no reliable way to know if a price was fair or a vehicle was what the seller claimed, and no one had built the data layer to fix that. Rishab Malik, who had previously helped run GSF India’s startup accelerator, joined as co-founder in January 2015 to build out business development. The founding bet was that a pricing engine and inspection standard, not just a listings page, would be the actual product worth paying for.

The struggle years

Droom’s setbacks are unusually well documented because so many of them show up in regulatory filings rather than only in press coverage.

• 2013 — founder’s insider-trading arrest: Aggarwal was arrested in the US over a 2009 tip he passed to hedge fund trader Richard Lee about Microsoft-Yahoo merger talks, from his time as an analyst; the case ran for years before he founded Droom (Moneylife; Business Standard, February 2020).
• February 2020 — the case is finally resolved, unfavourably: the US Department of Justice dropped criminal charges, but Aggarwal settled civil charges with the SEC for a $32,500 penalty and accepted a bar from association with any US broker, dealer or investment adviser (Business Standard, 19 February 2020).
• FY21 — revenue fell 25% even before the pandemic effect fully passed: operating revenue slid to around ₹125-136 crore as travel and vehicle-transfer restrictions hit transaction volumes (Inc42).
• October 2022 — the IPO is pulled: Droom withdrew its ₹3,000 crore draft prospectus, with SEBI’s weekly filing data recording the withdrawal on 12 October 2022, as new-age tech stocks were being marked down across the board (Inc42, October 2022).
• FY24 — revenue nearly halves, again: operating revenue fell 66% year-on-year to ₹85.4 crore, even as the company cut costs hard enough to narrow its net loss to ₹40.4 crore (Inc42; Entrackr, February 2025).

None of these were near-death in the sense of a shutdown notice. But a founder’s federal case unresolved for seven years, a withdrawn IPO, and a revenue base that has been cut by half twice in three years is not the story the company’s own marketing tells.

The turning point

The clearest before-and-after in Droom’s history is the pre-IPO funding round of July 2021. Droom raised up to $200 million in a Series G round led by 57 Stars and Seven Train Ventures, valuing the company at $1.2 billion and making it, by press count, the 17th Indian startup to reach unicorn status that year (TechCrunch, 27 July 2021). At the time, Droom told TechCrunch its annual GMV run-rate was $1.7 billion and its net revenue run-rate was $54 million, and it said it planned to list on Nasdaq or in India within a year.

What followed was the opposite trajectory. The India IPO filed that November was withdrawn eleven months later. By March 2025, Droom’s Indian subsidiary raised a fresh, much smaller round — ₹25 crore (about $2.9 million) from Finvolve, IA Growth Opportunities Fund II and a handful of individual investors — at a post-money valuation of ₹3,097 crore, or about $360 million (Entrackr, 13 March 2025). That is roughly a 70% cut from the 2021 peak. Aggarwal told Entrackr the low valuation for the India entity was “a strategic move” to give domestic investors room to gain, rather than a mark-down forced by the market — a framing worth noting alongside the number itself.

The money behind it

Droom has raised across more than a decade and multiple geographies — it is structured as a Singapore holding company with Indian and US subsidiaries. Total funding is estimated at $344 million across 10 rounds from 69 investors, per data aggregator Tracxn.

• Series C (2017): $20 million led by Integrated Asset Management and Digital Garage — brought in two backers that would anchor later rounds too.
• Series D (May 2018): $30 million led by Toyota Tsusho Corporation and Digital Garage of Japan — gave Droom an automotive-industry strategic investor rather than a pure financial one (YourStory; Business Standard, May 2018).
• Series G (July 2021): up to $200 million led by 57 Stars and Seven Train Ventures at a $1.2 billion valuation — the unicorn round and, in hindsight, the peak (TechCrunch, 27 July 2021).
• India subsidiary round (March 2025): ₹25 crore (~$2.9 million) led by Finvolve and IA Growth Opportunities Fund II at a ₹3,097 crore (~$360 million) valuation — the down round (Entrackr, 13 March 2025).

Named backers across rounds include Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Digital Garage, Beenext, Beenos, Integrated Asset Management, Lightbox, 57 Stars, Seven Train Ventures and Finvolve. What each changed, per the available record: Digital Garage and Integrated Asset Management gave Droom early institutional credibility from Series C; Toyota Tsusho added an OEM-adjacent strategic partner from Series D; the 2021 round funded the pre-IPO scale-up and marketing push that shows up in the FY22 numbers below; the 2025 round was explicitly framed by the founder as bridge capital ahead of a future listing, not growth capital.

How it makes money

Droom is a transaction and services marketplace, not an inventory business — it does not generally buy and resell vehicles itself, unlike some “instant” used-car buyers. Money comes in from several places layered on top of the core listings:

• Transaction/selling commission: reported at roughly 2-2.5% of a used car’s sale value and 2.5-3% for used two-wheelers when a deal closes on-platform.
• Dealer subscriptions: recurring fees from the dealer network that lists inventory on Droom, reported to account for a meaningful share of revenue.
• Droom Credit: a financing marketplace earning a processing fee, a cut of the loan value, and referral fees for leads passed to lending partners.
• Advertising: placements sold to auto and auto-adjacent brands (the company has cited relationships with names like Toyota and tyre makers) that want visibility to Droom’s buyer traffic.

The part people get wrong is assuming this mix means Droom’s costs scale with vehicles sold. In practice its single largest cost line is customer acquisition: advertising and promotion expenses were about 75% of total costs in FY25, rising to ₹162.5 crore from ₹88 crore a year earlier (Startuppedia, citing company filings, April 2026). That means Droom’s margin sits on how cheaply it can buy traffic and convert it to a paying transaction or subscription, not on logistics or vehicle financing risk the way an inventory-led competitor’s margin would. On that measure it improved in FY25: it spent ₹1.28 to generate every ₹1 of revenue, down from ₹1.53 in FY24 — still spending more than it earns, but less than before.

The numbers

Figures below are revenue from operations and net loss, in ₹ crore, as reported in company filings and covered by Inc42, Entrackr and Startuppedia.

• FY22 to FY23: revenue fell about 34% and losses were cut by more than half, as Droom pulled back the aggressive marketing spend that had driven FY22’s growth (Inc42, July 2023; TheKredible).
• FY23 to FY24: revenue fell a further 66%, even as losses kept narrowing — a sign the pullback in spend was cutting transactions faster than it was cutting costs (Inc42; Entrackr, February 2025).
• FY24 to FY25: revenue rose 88% but losses rose too, up 14% to ₹46.3 crore, as marketing spend was turned back on (Startuppedia, April 2026).

Where the money comes from

Droom does not publish a detailed segment-wise revenue split in the coverage available, but the cost and category structure point to where the business actually sits:

• Category mix: used cars and two-wheelers are the core categories by transaction volume; the company also lists commercial vehicles and a long tail of niche categories it uses for marketing distinctiveness rather than material revenue.
• Reach claimed by the company: presence across more than 1,100 cities and a network the company has put at over 20,000 dealers — company-stated figures, not independently audited.
• Cost concentration, the surprise: advertising and promotion, not headcount or technology, is the dominant cost line — about 75% of total FY25 expenses — meaning Droom behaves financially more like a performance-marketing business bolted onto a vehicle marketplace than a traditional listings platform.
• Employee costs shrank while revenue swung: employee expenses fell 39% year-on-year in FY24 to ₹42.9 crore even as the company prepared IPO paperwork, suggesting the cost cuts of FY23-24 came disproportionately from people, not marketing (Inc42, February 2025).

The risks

• An IPO that keeps slipping: Droom filed its first DRHP in November 2021, withdrew it in October 2022, was reported preparing a fresh ₹1,000 crore filing “by June” 2025 with a listing targeted for November 2025 (Inc42; IPO Central), and as of September 2026 that filing has still not materialised — Droom does not appear in Inc42’s own 2026 startup IPO tracker. Each slip resets the credibility clock with investors and dealers watching for a listing.
• Founder governance overhang: Sandeep Aggarwal’s 2013 US insider-trading case, only resolved via a 2020 SEC settlement and broker-dealer bar, is the kind of disclosed litigation history that Indian IPO due diligence and prospectus risk-factor sections are built to surface; it is a live consideration for any listing process, not a closed chapter simply because it predates Droom.
• Revenue that swings on marketing spend, not demand: a business whose revenue fell 66% in one year and rose 88% in the next, largely tracking how much it spends on advertising, has not demonstrated a durable, spend-independent demand base — a real risk if it needs to show public-market investors sustainable unit economics.
• Scale gap versus rivals it is compared against: in the same category, Cars24 reported FY22 revenue of ₹5,136.5 crore against Droom’s ₹384.6 crore that year (Inc42, July 2023) — a roughly 13x gap in the same fiscal year, undercutting the pioneer positioning Droom uses in its own marketing.

The takeaway

Droom’s history is a reminder that being first to identify a real problem — trust in a used-vehicle transaction — is not the same as building the business that ends up owning the solution at scale. It built genuinely useful infrastructure, a pricing engine, an inspection standard, a financing rails layer, years before larger-revenue rivals had equivalent tools. But infrastructure alone did not convert into transaction volume or revenue durability, and a founder’s legal history and a business model whose top line moves in lockstep with ad spend both became harder to explain the closer the company got to a public listing. The lesson that travels beyond automobiles: a good idea executed early buys you a head start, not a moat, and public markets will eventually ask the same demand-durability question that a marketplace’s own spending pattern already answers.

Frequently asked questions

What does Droom actually sell?

Droom operates an online marketplace for buying and selling used and new vehicles, primarily cars and two-wheelers, layered with paid tools including a vehicle pricing benchmark (Orange Book Value), inspection services, vehicle history records and a financing marketplace called Droom Credit.

Who founded Droom and when?

Sandeep Aggarwal founded Droom in April 2014, having previously founded ShopClues. Rishab Malik joined as co-founder in January 2015. The company is headquartered in Gurugram, India.

Has Droom gone public?

No. Droom filed a draft prospectus for a ₹3,000 crore IPO with SEBI in November 2021 and withdrew it in October 2022. Reports through 2025 pointed to a renewed, smaller filing, but no fresh DRHP had been completed as of September 2026.

Why did Droom’s valuation fall so sharply?

Droom was valued at $1.2 billion in a July 2021 pre-IPO round. A March 2025 funding round for its India subsidiary valued the company at about $360 million, a cut of roughly 70%, which the founder has described as a deliberate low valuation for domestic investors rather than a forced markdown.

Is Droom profitable?

No. Droom has reported a net loss every year across the FY22-FY25 period covered here, with losses ranging from about ₹40 crore to ₹137 crore depending on the year and how much it was spending on marketing.

Sources

Figures are as of September 2026. Currency converted at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026 (Trading Economics).

• TechCrunch, “Indian automobile marketplace Droom valued at $1.2 billion in $200 million pre-IPO funding,” July 2021
• Business Standard, “US DoJ drops charges against Droom founder in insider trading case,” February 2020
• Business Standard, “Delhi HC puts gag order on Sandeep Aggarwal in ShopClues case,” September 2017
• Moneylife, “ShopClues founder Sandeep Aggarwal arrested on insider trading charges,” 2013
• Inc42, “Amid Market Volatility, Droom Withdraws INR 3,000 Cr IPO Bid,” October 2022
• Inc42, “India’s Used Cars Race: Comparing FY22 Numbers For CARS24, Droom, Spinny,” July 2023
• Inc42, “IPO-Bound Droom’s FY24 Loss Declines 35% To INR 40 Cr,” February 2025
• Inc42, “Exclusive: Droom To File Draft Papers For INR 1,000 Cr IPO By June,” 2025
• Entrackr, “Droom’s revenue plummets 66% to Rs 85 Cr in FY24,” February 2025
• Entrackr, “Exclusive: Droom India raises funds at $360 Mn valuation,” March 2025
• TheKredible, “Droom’s revenue sinks 32% in FY23, losses drop to Rs 62 Cr”
• YourStory, “Droom’s loss widens amid higher expenses in FY22,” July 2023
• Business Standard / YourStory, “Droom raises USD 30 mn funding led by Toyota Tsusho Corporation,” May 2018
• IPO Central, “Droom IPO: Used Car Marketplace Plans INR 1,000 Cr Public Issue By June 2025,” October 2025
• Startuppedia, “Auto-Tech Platform Droom Posts 88% Jump in FY25 Revenue to Rs 169 Cr; Losses Expand,” April 2026
• Inc42, “Indian Startup IPO Tracker 2026” (Droom absent as of research date)

Found an error? Write to us and we’ll correct it in the open, dated, on the piece.