Startup Deep Dive : NoBroker — revenue crossed Rs 1,000 crore but it still quietly charges landlords a broker-like fee

NoBroker crossed ₹1,000 crore ($104 million at $1 ≈ ₹96.0) in revenue for the year to March 2026, its co-founder told reporters this month, with profitability now promised within eight to ten months. The contradiction sits right under that headline number: a company built entirely on the promise of cutting brokers out of Indian real estate has, in its most sought-after cities, quietly started charging property owners a fee that works almost exactly like the brokerage it was founded to kill.

That tension — between the founding story and the business NoBroker has actually become — runs through everything that follows: eleven years of near-misses, a physical attack on its own office, a $210 million round that turned it into India’s first proptech unicorn, and a set of financials that still show losses even as revenue closes in on four digits of crores.

Quick facts

What they do

NoBroker runs an online marketplace that lets property owners and tenants, and increasingly buyers and sellers, deal with each other directly instead of through a real estate agent. A user in Bengaluru, Chennai, Mumbai, Pune, Hyderabad or Delhi NCR can list a flat for rent or resale for free, and pay a subscription fee to unlock verified contact details on the other side. Around that core, the company has built NoBrokerHood, a society-management app used by residential complexes for visitor logs, maintenance billing and security; a packers-and-movers marketplace; home interiors and repair services; and a financial-services layer that sells home loans and insurance. The common thread is the Indian urban household moving, settling in or maintaining a home, with NoBroker trying to sit inside every step of that journey rather than just the first one.

The origin

The founding insight was almost insultingly simple. Amit Kumar Agarwal, an IIT Kanpur engineer who went on to IIM Ahmedabad and then a decade in consulting and banking strategy roles at PwC and ANZ, put it as a question: a broker’s entire job is to introduce a tenant to a landlord, so why should that introduction cost a full month’s rent. Agarwal, Saurabh Garg and Akhil Gupta had each been burned by the same problem while relocating between Indian cities for work and college — high commissions, and patchy service to go with them. In 2014, in Bengaluru, they set out to replace the broker with a direct, consumer-to-consumer listings platform, betting that Indians would trust technology with a transaction most of them had only ever done through a middleman.

The struggle years

The idea was not an easy sell. More than twenty venture capital firms turned the founders down in the early years, unconvinced that a high-trust transaction like renting or buying a home could work without a human broker vouching for both sides. Money got tight enough that Agarwal has said he could not afford flight tickets to investor meetings at one point, while his wife was expecting their first child and the couple still had a home loan EMI to pay. The company survived on small, unglamorous cheques: about $3 million from SAIF Partners, now Elevation Capital, from February 2015, followed by further rounds from investors in Japan and South Korea, including Seoul-based KTB Network’s first-ever India investment.

The resistance was not only financial. In 2015, more than forty brokers stormed NoBroker’s Bengaluru office, threatening staff before the police intervened, an unambiguous sign of how directly the model threatened an entrenched, cash-driven trade. Garg has since described the attack as confirmation that the company was “onto something important,” and, notably, no employee resigned over it. Five years later, in 2020, the company found itself on the other side of a legal fight instead of a physical one: NoBroker sued rival society-management app MyGate, alleging it had unlawfully obtained NoBrokerHood’s user data, and MyGate filed a counter-suit making similar allegations against NoBroker. The dispute was a reminder that as NoBroker diversified into adjacent businesses, it was also picking new, better-funded fights.

The turning point

The moment that changed NoBroker’s trajectory came in November 2021, when it raised $210 million in a Series E round led by Tiger Global, General Atlantic and Moore Strategic Ventures, at a valuation of about $1 billion. It made NoBroker India’s first proptech unicorn. The contrast with the years before is stark: a founder who once could not fund a flight to meet an investor was, within seven years, running a company that General Atlantic’s own dealmakers were competing to back, on the back of a platform that by then had roughly 7.5 million listed properties and 16 million users, having grown three-fold in the preceding year. The round did not fix the business model on its own, but it gave NoBroker the capital and credibility to push aggressively into the adjacent businesses — NoBrokerHood, packers and movers, home services — that now make up roughly half its revenue.

The money behind it

NoBroker has raised roughly $361-368 million in total across nine rounds since 2015, according to company disclosures and data tracked by Tracxn. Three backers stand out for what they changed. Elevation Capital (then SAIF Partners) came in first, in February 2015, when Indian investors were largely unwilling to fund the model, and kept the company alive through its leanest years. General Atlantic entered in the Series C round in 2019 and went on to co-lead the 2021 Series E, bringing the growth-stage capital and governance discipline that took NoBroker from a scrappy listings site to unicorn status. Tiger Global, the other Series E co-lead, added the kind of aggressive growth-investing conviction that let NoBroker expand into new cities and verticals simultaneously rather than sequentially. Google joined as a new investor in an extended tranche of the Series E in March 2023, putting in $5 million from its India Digitization Fund and signalling a product partnership around the broader home-ownership journey rather than a purely financial bet.

That March 2023 round is also the last one with a disclosed valuation, and the figure depends on who is doing the counting: trade press reported it at about $1.06 billion, while data provider Tracxn lists the same round at ₹7,850 crore, or roughly $940 million. Either way, NoBroker has not disclosed a markup since, and the company itself said in September 2026 that it is not currently in the market to raise fresh capital or to list, preferring to fund itself to profitability first.

How it makes money

NoBroker’s revenue engine has three broad layers. The oldest and still largest is the real estate marketplace itself: subscription plans that owners and tenants buy to unlock contact details and relationship-manager support for rentals, resales and, increasingly, primary (new-build) sales, where the average ticket size the company processes is far higher than a rental subscription. Layered on top is a fast-growing set of adjacent services — packers and movers, home interiors and renovation, and general home services — which the company runs largely as a marketplace, taking a cut of jobs booked through the platform rather than owning the labour itself, which keeps its own headcount lower but also caps the margin on each transaction. The third layer is financial services and NoBrokerHood: referral commissions on home loans and insurance, plus subscription and advertising revenue from the society-management app used by residential complexes.

The part outsiders consistently get wrong is that “brokerage-free” no longer means “free.” In its most competitive markets, Bengaluru and Chennai, NoBroker has rolled out a postpaid plan for landlords that charges a fee only once a tenant is locked in, structurally close to how a traditional broker earns commission, alongside the older upfront subscription plans priced from roughly ₹3,000 to ₹15,000 depending on the city and package. NoBroker’s own numbers underline why: the vast majority of users who successfully complete a rental or sale on the platform never pay it a rupee, so monetising the minority who do, at a high enough price, is what the entire model rests on.

The numbers

NoBroker has not listed, so its numbers come from financial filings reported by business media rather than exchange disclosures. Losses have narrowed each year even as the “miscellaneous overheads” line in its cost base has drawn scrutiny: in FY24, ₹738 crore, or 57% of total expenses of ₹1,299 crore, sat in that bucket with limited public breakdown.

Read across the four years, the shape of the business is consistent: revenue up roughly 30% a year, and losses shrinking by a similar order each year without yet turning positive. FY24’s audited numbers show subscription revenue from the core real estate business still supplying the overwhelming share of operating revenue, with the newer verticals contributing but not yet carrying the business.

Where the money comes from

By the account NoBroker’s own leadership gave in mid-2026, the core property marketplace — rental and resale subscriptions plus the newer primary-sales business — still supplies roughly half of revenue. Financial services, the loan and insurance referral business, contributes a little over a fifth. The rest comes from the businesses that were once side projects: packers and movers, home interiors, home services and NoBrokerHood together. Co-founder Saurabh Garg has said these “ancillary businesses” combined now account for close to half of total revenue, a marked shift from a decade ago when NoBroker was, almost entirely, a rental-listings site.

The surprise inside that split is the primary-sales business. NoBroker told reporters it processed about ₹1,000 crore of primary (new-build) property sales in a single month in March 2026, with an average primary-sale ticket size of about ₹1.4 crore against roughly ₹89 lakh for an average resale property. A handful of large-ticket new-home sales can move the revenue needle as much as thousands of smaller rental subscriptions, which is part of why the company has been pushing buyers, not just tenants, as its highest-value customer segment.

The risks

Three risks sit close to the surface. The first is disclosure quality: with well over half of FY24’s expense base sitting in an unexplained “miscellaneous overheads” line, outside observers cannot fully verify where NoBroker’s cost pressure actually comes from, which matters more, not less, as the company edges toward a possible IPO. The second is brand risk from the postpaid and subscription fee structures charged to owners in premium markets: a platform whose entire identity is the word “no broker” is exposed if its most profitable customers start to feel they are paying a broker’s fee in a different wrapper, and user complaints about inflated rent quotes and refund friction on paid plans have already surfaced publicly. The third is competitive breadth: NoBroker is fighting on several fronts at once — listings portals such as 99acres, MagicBricks and Housing.com in real estate, Urban Company in home services, and MyGate in society management — which spreads management attention and capital across markets that each have a well-funded specialist already established.

The takeaway

NoBroker’s lesson is less about replacing an incumbent than about what happens after you actually do it. Removing the broker’s fee got the company its unicorn round and a decade of headlines, but ten years in, the harder problem has turned out to be persuading paying customers to keep paying once free alternatives exist, without becoming the thing it set out to replace. Companies that solve a painful problem for free users eventually have to monetise a minority of them properly, and that monetisation almost always ends up resembling the model they originally set out to replace.

Frequently asked questions

Is NoBroker profitable?

Not yet. It reported a net loss of about ₹300 crore in FY25 on revenue of ₹965 crore, narrower than the ₹411 crore loss on ₹803 crore revenue in FY24. The company has said it is targeting profitability within eight to ten months of September 2026.

Who owns NoBroker?

Founders Amit Kumar Agarwal, Akhil Gupta and Saurabh Garg retain stakes alongside institutional investors including General Atlantic, Tiger Global Management, Elevation Capital, Moore Strategic Ventures and Google, who together have put in roughly $361-368 million since 2015.

Is NoBroker actually free?

Listing a property is free, but unlocking verified contact details or using relationship-manager support requires a paid plan, typically ₹3,000 to ₹15,000 depending on city and package. In Bengaluru and Chennai it has also introduced a postpaid plan for landlords that charges only after a tenant is found, structurally similar to a traditional broker’s commission.

What is NoBroker’s valuation?

Its last disclosed round, an extended Series E with Google in March 2023, was reported at about $1.06 billion by trade press and at roughly ₹7,850 crore (about $940 million) by data provider Tracxn. No updated valuation has been publicly confirmed since.

Is NoBroker planning an IPO?

As of September 2026, co-founder and CEO Amit Kumar Agarwal has said the company is focused entirely on reaching profitability and is not currently raising funds or preparing to list, though he has left open the possibility of an IPO after profitability is achieved.

Sources

Figures are as of September 2026. Currency converted at $1 ≈ ₹96.0 as of 18 September 2026 (Trading Economics).

• Business Standard, “NoBroker.com becomes unicorn; raises $210 mn at $1 bn valuation,” November 2021
• TechCrunch, “NoBroker becomes first Indian proptech unicorn with fresh $210 million funding,” November 2021
• Business Today, “Google backs online real estate portal NoBroker,” March 2023
• Silicon Valley Invest Club, “NoBroker raises $5 million in a Series E round at a valuation of about $1.06 billion,” March 2023
• Tracxn, NoBroker company and funding profile, accessed September 2026
• Entrackr (Fintrackr), “NoBroker reports Rs 803 Cr revenue in FY24, but 57% expenses remain unexplained,” May 2025
• Urban Acres / Business Standard, “NoBroker eyes profitability in 8-10 months, FY26 revenue tops Rs 1,000 cr: CEO,” September 2026
• Inc42, “NoBroker’s Future Is Beyond Home Listings, But Will Profits Follow?,” July 2026
• Wikipedia, “NoBroker,” accessed September 2026
• Founder Thesis, “Amit Agarwal & NoBroker: The IIT-IIM Alum Who Built India’s First Proptech Unicorn,” accessed September 2026

Found an error? Write to us and we’ll correct it in the open, dated, on the piece.